QUnit vs Jasmine?
20,508
QUnit is very easy to get started with, as you only need to include two files and a little bit of markup, then you can start writing tests.
Jasmine strength, afaik is its BDD-style syntax, if that is something that you prefer (probably not a selling point for you) and tight integration into Ruby/Rails tools.
In the end both get the job done. I recommend to start with QUnit. Once you're feeling comfortable, try Jasmine and check if the BDD style fits better. If it does and you still want to keep using QUnit, you can add Pavlov to the mix, which provides BDD-style methods for QUnit.
Related videos on Youtube
03 : 19
Jorgeous & Jasmine’s Etta James Lip Sync! 🎤✨ RuPaul’s Drag Race Season 14
03 : 14
Bosco & Jasmine Kennedie’s Diana Ross Lip Sync ⭐️ RuPaul’s Drag Race Season 14
02 : 54
Daya Betty & Jasmine Kennedie’s “Respect” Lip Sync 😱 RuPaul’s Drag Race Season 14
22 : 31
Answering TOUGH questions about the hijab 🤔
11 : 48
Javascript Unit Testing with Jasmine
01 : 21
JavaScript : Karma vs testing framework Jasmine, Mocha, QUnit
01 : 15 : 40
2015 Women 9-Ball WC - Jasmin Ouschan vs Pan Xiaoting 潘曉婷
11 : 00
QUnit Demo
01 : 19
Karma vs testing framework Jasmine, Mocha, QUnit - JavaScript
Author by
Sahat Yalkabov
Updated on August 22, 2022Comments
-
Sahat Yalkabov almost 2 years
What are the main differences between these two testing frameworks?
I am a totally new to Test Driven Development and starting from the very beginning.
-
Patrick almost 11 yearsWhat did you go with in the end?
-
-
raam86 almost 11 yearsNice answer. I also recommend javascriptjabber.com/050-jsj-qunit-with-jorn-zaefferer
