Rails migration for has_and_belongs_to_many join table
Solution 1
Where:
class Teacher < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :students
end
and
class Student < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :teachers
end
for rails 4:
rails generate migration CreateJoinTableStudentTeacher student teacher
for rails 3:
rails generate migration students_teachers student_id:integer teacher_id:integer
for rails < 3
script/generate migration students_teachers student_id:integer teacher_id:integer
(note the table name lists both join tables in alphabetical order)
and then for rails 3 and below only, you need to edit your generated migration so an id field is not created:
create_table :students_teachers, :id => false do |t|
Solution 2
A has_and_belongs_to_many
table must match this format. I'm assuming the two models to be joined by has_and_belongs_to_many
are already in the DB : apples
and oranges
:
create_table :apples_oranges, :id => false do |t|
t.references :apple, :null => false
t.references :orange, :null => false
end
# Adding the index can massively speed up join tables. Don't use the
# unique if you allow duplicates.
add_index(:apples_oranges, [:apple_id, :orange_id], :unique => true)
If you use the :unique => true
on the index, then you should (in rails3) pass :uniq => true
to has_and_belongs_to_many
.
More information: Rails Docs
UPDATED 2010-12-13 I've updated it to remove the id and timestamps... Basically ma11hew28
and nunopolonia
are correct: There must not be an id and there must not be timestamps or rails won't allow has_and_belongs_to_many
to work.
Solution 3
You should name the table the names of 2 models you want to connect by alphabetical order and put the two model id's in the table. Then connect each model to each other creating the associations in the model.
Here's an example:
# in migration
def self.up
create_table 'categories_products', :id => false do |t|
t.column :category_id, :integer
t.column :product_id, :integer
end
end
# models/product.rb
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories
# models/category.rb
has_and_belongs_to_many :products
But this is not very flexible and you should think about using has_many :through
Solution 4
The top answer shows a composite index that I don't believe will be used to lookup apples from oranges.
create_table :apples_oranges, :id => false do |t|
t.references :apple, :null => false
t.references :orange, :null => false
end
# Adding the index can massively speed up join tables.
# This enforces uniqueness and speeds up apple->oranges lookups.
add_index(:apples_oranges, [:apple_id, :orange_id], :unique => true)
# This speeds up orange->apple lookups
add_index(:apples_oranges, :orange_id)
I did find the answer this is based on by 'The Doctor What' useful and the discussion certainly so too.
Solution 5
In rails 4, you can simple use
create_join_table :table1s, :table2s
it is all.
Caution: you must offord table1, table2 with alphanumeric.
ma11hew28
Updated on August 10, 2020Comments
-
ma11hew28 almost 4 years
How do I do a
script/generate migration
to create a join table for ahas_and_belongs_to_many
relationship?The application runs on Rails 2.3.2, but I also have Rails 3.0.3 installed.
-
ma11hew28 over 13 yearsActually, a join table should only have the two references columns and doesn't have id or timestamp columns. Here is a better example of a has_and_belongs_to_many migration from the link you gave. I'm looking for a way to do it from the command line with
script/generate migration
... -
docwhat over 13 yearsWell, it doesn't have to have the timestamps; I marked it optional in my example. I would recommend adding the id, though. There are cases where either the ID or the timestamp can be useful. But I strongly recommend the ID.
-
ma11hew28 over 13 yearsOk. What is a case where the ID would be useful?
-
docwhat about 13 yearsOne example is if the relationship is important enough to have a view. It can also be used to speed up accessing the databas by passing around the relationship.id instead of looking it up repeatedly. It also makes troubleshooting the database easier. Especially if the ids of the other columns is really high. It's easier to remember id:12345 instead of id:54321-id:67890 -- But that being said, if the table gets really big then you may want to be able to save space by not allocating another id for each relationship.
-
ndemoreau over 12 yearsHi, I've been using has_and_belongs_to_many associations for quite a bit with id in my join table without any hassle. What kind of trouble is this supposed to generate?
-
pingu almost 12 yearsThis is the only reply that actually answers the question.
-
hoffmanc almost 11 years@pingu: except that it doesn't work, at least in Rails 3.2. The generated migration file is blank.
-
Joseph Lord over 10 yearsI don't think the multicolumn index is the right solution for this. It will work for queries for particular apples to find the related oranges but not the other way round. Two single column indexes would allow both directions to be queried efficiently possibly at a small loss to existence checks of a particular apple, orange combination).
-
Mike over 9 years@hoffmanc It will generate an empty migration file if you do not specify any fields. You must specify the fields if you want Rails to automatically add them to the migration file.
-
Mauricio Moraes over 9 years@JosephLord is correct. You should verify which direction you want to optimize. Also, you must know that indices slow down insertion a bit, so be carefull if data input speed is a constraint to you.
-
zx1986 about 9 yearshello, I'm trying
rails generate migration CreateJoinTableTeacherStudent teacher student
instead ofrails generate migration CreateJoinTableStudentTeacher student teacher
, is that the same? Does S(tudent) need to before T(eacher)? -
dangerousdave about 9 years@zx1986, yes, it needs to be in that order.
-
zx1986 about 9 yearsoh! thanks @dangerousdave , I read this blog recently: ruby-journal.com/rails-4-changes-join-table-naming-convention
-
Zakaria about 9 yearsi want use it command to create
has_many :through
to declare a many-to-many relationship between models. but i can't :( -
Adib Saad almost 9 years
add_foreign_key
will fail if placed in the same migration as the one that created the tables. -
jgrant about 8 yearsThank you, this worked perfectly for my Rails 4 app.
-
Taylored Web Sites over 6 yearsthis is a good up to date solution. Note, the join table is not accessible as a model, but through the has_and_belongs_to_many relations that are set up on both of the joined tables.