Rcpp package doesn't include Rcpp_precious_remove

79,448

Solution 1

I had the same problem with another package and the issue was that I was running a recent version of the package compiled against a previous version of Rcpp. As user20650 points out in the comment, updating Rcpp to 1.0.7 should fix it:

install.packages('Rcpp') 

In RStudio you can also use the packages panel to update the packages, as in the following image:

Enter image description here

Solution 2

I had the same problem with the packages: raster, tmap and sf. Reinstalling the package Rcpp solved the problem:

install.packages('Rcpp')
library(Rcpp)
Share:
79,448
Laxmi Agarwal
Author by

Laxmi Agarwal

Updated on July 05, 2022

Comments

  • Laxmi Agarwal
    Laxmi Agarwal almost 2 years

    I have been trying to create a database and installed the "DBI" package, but I am still facing this error. I reinstalled DBI and RSQLite package, but they don’t seem to work.

    library("DBI")
    con <- dbConnect
    (RSQLite::SQLite(), dbname = ":memory:")
    dbListTables(con)
    

    Error:

    Error in connection_connect(dbname, loadable.extensions, flags, vfs, extended_types) : function 'Rcpp_precious_remove' not provided by package 'Rcpp'

  • DeBARtha
    DeBARtha almost 3 years
    Well, install.packages didn't solve this problem in my computer, but update.packages did. Is there any specific reason as to why this happened?
  • Marcelo Avila
    Marcelo Avila almost 3 years
    well, hard to say, since dealing with packages always involves multiple processes that might fail for different reasons. I wouldn't worry too much about it though...
  • EcologyTom
    EcologyTom over 2 years
    This worked for me, but I had to restart RStudio afterwards for this to take effect.
  • noriega
    noriega over 2 years
    Just adding some info: I had the same problem with the mapview package and after re-installing Rcpp I didn't need to load it, just library(mapview).
  • IRTFM
    IRTFM over 2 years
    @DeBARtha Reading this I suspect that both the calling package, "DBI" in the questioners case, and "Rcpp" both needed to have been included in the install.packages operation, and if you were compiling the packages from source you might have needed to order to be Rcpp first and any dependent package to be later. Dependencies are first sought in the user's libraries, so a more recent version might exist on CRAN or Github or Rforge or BioC. Package authors should ideally include version numbers if such a dependency exists, but they might not be aware of it.