Redirect to index.html for S3 subfolder

20,583

Solution 1

No need for a lambda function adding expense and complexity to your project.

The following answer is quoted from https://stevepapa.com/

https://stevepapa.com/my-great-new-post/ would be expected to work the same way as: https://stevepapa.com/my-great-new-post/index.html

There’s a clever little way to get these flowing through to the Cloudfront distribution, and it involves changing the source origin from the one that Cloudfront presents to you by default.

When selecting the origin source Cloudfront will show you a list of S3 buckets. editing origin

Instead of setting the source from the bucket shown in the dropdown list, you’ll need to grab the static web hosting endpoint for that resource from its S3 settings page and pop it in manually. where the static hosting endpoint url is

Using the static source for the Cloudfront distribution origin means any request to that distribution will be using the S3’s root object lookup, and your 404 responses should disappear as the references flow through.

Important

After doing this:

Otherwise, the changes you made won't go live immediately.

Solution 2

So I had this problem last night too.

The issue is as follows: S3 when configured as a website bucket is forgiving and has the index document setting, set to index.html and this gets applied at the root, ie, example.com actually gets redirected to example.com/index.html, and it also gets applied at the subfolder level, so example.com/new or example.com/new/ should both redirect to example.com/new/index.html, where there would be an object in the bucket. (If not, you'd get a NoSuchKey error instead.)

However you then "upgrade" yourself to CloudFront, likely for HTTPS, and this feature goes away. CloudFront instead makes explicit API calls to S3 and therefore doesn't trigger the index document concession. It does work for the root, but not for subfolders.

The RoutingRules solution doesn't look clean to me because by specifying KeyPrefixEquals rather than key exactly equals (which doesn't exist) I think you'd get unintended matches.

I instead have implemented a Lambda@Edge rule that rewrites the request that CloudFront makes to S3 to have a proper key value in it.

Start with the Lambda docs and the A/B testing example here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/lambda-examples.html#lambda-examples-general-examples

Change the code to:

'use strict';

exports.handler = (event, context, callback) => {
    /*
     * Expand S3 request to have index.html if it ends in /
     */
    const request = event.Records[0].cf.request;
    if ((request.uri !== "/") /* Not the root object, which redirects properly */
        && (request.uri.endsWith("/") /* Folder with slash */
            || (request.uri.lastIndexOf(".") < request.uri.lastIndexOf("/")) /* Most likely a folder, it has no extension (heuristic) */
            )) {
        if (request.uri.endsWith("/"))
            request.uri = request.uri.concat("index.html");
        else
            request.uri = request.uri.concat("/index.html");
    }
    callback(null, request);
};

And publish it to your CloudFront distribution.

Solution 3

There is even easier way to accomplish this with an HTML redirect file

  1. Create a plain file named my-great-new-post (don't worry there won't be a name conflict with the folder in the same bucket)

  2. Write a meta-redirect code in that file (I pasted the code below)

  3. upload file to root bucket (where my-great-new-post folder lays)

  4. modify metadata of the new file and make Content-Type:text/html

Here lays the content of the file:

<!DOCTYPE html>
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=/my-great-new-post/index.html">
    </head>
    <body>
    </body>
    </html>

Solution 4

When you enable and configure static hosting with S3 you need to access the site via the bucket website endpoint. You can find this URL in the bucket properties in the Static website hosting section.

S3 Static website hosting settings

The URL of the website endpoint will look like this:

http://example-bucket.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/example-folder/

However (confusingly) objects stored in S3 are also accessible via a different URL, this url does not honour the index rules on subfolders. This URL looks like this:

https://example-bucket.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/example-folder/
Share:
20,583
g3blv
Author by

g3blv

Updated on July 09, 2022

Comments

  • g3blv
    g3blv almost 2 years

    I have a domain example.com. I have a S3 bucket named example.com setup with an index.html file that works. Now I like to create two subfolders called old and new, each containing a separate version of a single page application. Requesting https://example.com/old (I like to omit the index.html when entering the request in address bar for browser) would open the index.html file in the old subfolder and requesting https://example.com/new would open the index.html. What is the best way of doing these redirects? Should I set something up in Route 53 example.com/old -> example.com/old/index.html or is there a better way of doing it?

  • g3blv
    g3blv about 6 years
    Thanks. That is the guide that I have followed and that is the setup I have in CloudFront but that doesn't work for example.com/old or example.com/new. It results in access denied while example.com/old/index.html responds with the contents of the index.html in the old folder. Requesting example.com should keep responding with the index.html under example.com.
  • g3blv
    g3blv about 6 years
    Thanks. I tested it but I still end up at access denied rather than the old/index.html or new/index.html
  • yaliceme
    yaliceme almost 6 years
    I had the exact same issue as OP, and this worked! thank you
  • VsMaX
    VsMaX over 5 years
    Worked for me!!! Thousands of thanks!!!! You saved my day of time because of thi s article.
  • djuth
    djuth over 5 years
    Worked for me as well.
  • Dan Parker
    Dan Parker about 5 years
    Worked great, this should be marked as answer, so I don't have to read the other stuff on top
  • Nogwater
    Nogwater about 5 years
    Here's an AWS blog post with a similar solution aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/…
  • Thomas Amar
    Thomas Amar over 4 years
    This is the best, simplest answer.
  • 101010
    101010 about 4 years
    After a years (read: years) of messing with S3 redirect rules, I'm done. This works best. "Best" meaning: I do this every few months over years and I appreciate that it "just works".
  • Leonardo Romanello
    Leonardo Romanello about 4 years
    Would there be a way to achieve the same for https://stevepapa.com/my-great-new-post without the trailing /?
  • Askdesigners
    Askdesigners almost 4 years
    Agreed. The documentation on redirect rules is really not great and there are no examples at all.
  • Michael Schmid
    Michael Schmid over 3 years
    This does’t work for me. When I enter the endpoint URL, it puts it back to the bucket name upon bluring the input field.
  • Daniel Apt
    Daniel Apt over 3 years
    @LeonardoRomanello - THis worked without any trailing / (it specifically routed https://example.com/blog to https://example.com/blog/ automatically)
  • michaelosthege
    michaelosthege over 3 years
    Thank you for this simple solution. I appreciate not having to learn what AWS Lambda functions are - let alone how to write them.
  • Charles Fulton
    Charles Fulton over 3 years
    A downside to this approach is that the objects in the S3 bucket must be publicly accessible, otherwise, CloudFront will show a 403 forbidden error.
  • pat-s
    pat-s over 3 years
    Using the REST API endpoint is preferred over using the website endpoint as otherwise you have two endpoints with different permissions. These might be indexed twice in web searches and the non-SSL endpoint might be vulnerable to potential attacks. See the AWS docs for more info. Therefore I'd highly recommend jkingok answer which uses the Lambda@Edge approach.
  • Hoon
    Hoon over 3 years
    I was browsing for this solution for days! Thanks!
  • baduker
    baduker about 3 years
    That is so much better than the official AWS documentation!
  • piyush sachdeva
    piyush sachdeva almost 3 years
    This was the only option that worked for me! Thank you very much for the great workaround
  • diegodsp
    diegodsp over 2 years
    This cause too many redirects.
  • bjovanov
    bjovanov over 2 years
    Love you so much!
  • thedanotto
    thedanotto over 2 years
    this is still legit!
  • thapakazi
    thapakazi almost 2 years
    Manish brought me here... I owe you a beer/coffeee. Thanks mate