Remove documentation to save hard drive space
Solution 1
According to the Ubuntu wiki, you can instruct dpkg
not to install any documentation. This should prevent any documentation (except copyright info) from being installed by apt.
Create a file
/etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/01_nodoc
which specifies the desired filters. Example:path-exclude /usr/share/doc/* # we need to keep copyright files for legal reasons path-include /usr/share/doc/*/copyright # if you also want to remove the man pages uncomment the next line #path-exclude /usr/share/man/* path-exclude /usr/share/groff/* path-exclude /usr/share/info/* # lintian stuff is small, but really unnecessary path-exclude /usr/share/lintian/* path-exclude /usr/share/linda/*
Then you can manually remove any documentation already installed:
find /usr/share/doc -depth -type f ! -name copyright|xargs rm || true
find /usr/share/doc -empty|xargs rmdir || true
rm -rf /usr/share/groff/* /usr/share/info/*
rm -rf /usr/share/lintian/* /usr/share/linda/* /var/cache/man/*
If you also want to remove the man pages do:
rm -rf /usr/share/man/*
The example is written for OEMs, but it worked just as well for me. Took my /usr/share/doc/
directory down from ~150MB to ~20MB.
Solution 2
This should remove the documentation for latex-related packages:
sudo apt-get --purge remove tex.\*-doc$
It does save a few hundred MB.
Solution 3
Quick-and-dirty way to find the installed texlive packages (I'm 100% sure there are other ways):
dpkg -l | grep '^ii.*texlive.*doc'
And removing them:
apt-get remove --purge \
texlive-fonts-recommended-doc texlive-latex-base-doc texlive-latex-extra-doc \
texlive-latex-recommended-doc texlive-pictures-doc texlive-pstricks-doc
Solution 4
Do you know what is taking up all of that space? My /usr/share/doc
is only ~50MB. If not, use the Disk Analyzer application or go to the terminal and run cd /usr/share/doc
; then run du -h -d 1
to find out what is using all of that space. Once you know which program or program are the problem then you can decide if you should remove the directories in /usr/share/doc
or not.
Solution 5
A small modification to mopagemo's answer. If LaTeX was originally installed via texlive-full
, then removing that metapackage will lead to all of its dependencies being added to the autoremove queue. To fix this, we need to flag the packages as manually installed.
Here's a list of the steps I took to remove the docs and remove the desired packages from the autoremove queue:
sudo apt-get --purge remove tex.\*-doc$
- Copy the packages that appear between "The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required" and "Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them." into a text editor, and remove all the new lines.
- Try to
sudo apt-get install
all of these packages. - You will probably get a series of "Unable to locate package" messages. Remove these ghost packages from the list in your text editor.
- Try
sudo apt-get install
again on the smaller list. This should flag all of the packages as manually installed. - You may get another "no longer required" message. If so, repeat steps 2--5.
It doesn't take long to do this, and the benefit is that you aren't breaking any existing packages or dependencies. You could even reinstall texlive-full over the top. You might want to keep a list of the flagged packages if you intend to uninstall completely at some point.
This freed up just over 1000 MB on my system.
Related videos on Youtube
![Martin Scharrer](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xKiXv.jpg?s=256&g=1)
Martin Scharrer
I'm a electronic engineer which likes to program.
Updated on September 18, 2022Comments
-
Martin Scharrer almost 2 years
I like to create a rather small Ubuntu installation in a Virtual Box machine. It should basically just provide TeX Live and related tools. I figured now that I have almost 1GB of data under
/usr/share/doc
. I don't need this documentation in this case, just the LaTeX relatedman
pages, which are not located there.Is there a way to uninstall all these documentation files using
apt-get
?
Alternatively, is it reasonably save to just delete the content of/usr/share/doc
?
I like to share the Virtual Box machine with others, which shouldn't run in trouble.-
Mechanical snail almost 12 years
-
KernelPan1c over 8 yearsThe same question for Debian unix.stackexchange.com/questions/180400/…
-
Zaz about 5 yearsDenilson's answer solves this problem without taking a hammer to it. Just uninstall the doc packages.
-
-
Martin Scharrer about 12 yearsI was not aware that the directory names under
/usr/share/doc
are the packages names. At least of some this seems to be true. I useddu -sc * | sort -n
in/usr/share/doc
. Most space was taken from the TeX Live 2009 documentation files which I don't want anyway, because I have the manually installed TL 2011 ones. Thanks, while I still like to see if there is a way to tellapt-get
to get ride of most documentation, this solution worked out fine for this case. -
joar almost 11 yearsThis seems to remove my
texlive-full
package too. -
A T over 9 yearsI had to recreate one of those folders to get @denilson-sá purge recommendation to work. Specifically:
mkdir /usr/share/info
. -
rubo77 over 9 yearsOn a local machine, you could also delete the copyright files, which will save another ~50MB. Comment this line like:
# path-include /usr/share/doc/*/copyright
-
ahcox over 9 yearsThe first line (plus deleting copyright) left me with 37MB on 13.04. There are lots of symlinked files that are missed by the find. This helps by 5MB:
find /usr/share/doc | egrep "\.gz" | xargs rm
. This drops the size down to 26 MB:find /usr/share/doc | egrep "\.pdf$" | xargs rm
. Down to 21 MB:find /usr/share/doc | egrep "\.tex$" | xargs rm
. There are loads more files left behind though. -
Andrew Ensley almost 8 years@AT, the commands in my answer don't remove
/usr/share/info
; just its contents. The directory should still be there after running them. -
Balazs almost 8 yearsAnd for those who aren't comfortable with du: you can use Baobab to analyze disk usage. Though one does need to run it as root (sudo baobab) to index the contents of /
-
Jus12 over 7 yearsThis also removes
texlive-full
on Ubuntu 16.04. -
Jus12 over 7 yearsI don't recommend this step for a few MBs. I did and my system got broken. For instance, Virtualbox checks for installation by checking if a directory
/usr/share/doc/virtualbox
exists..Created the directory and all worked well. Took me around 2 days to figure that out. Talk about space-time trade-off! -
Andrew Ensley over 7 years@Jus12 Good point. I certainly wouldn't recommend this as a rule, but if you're desperate for space (like I was with a 16GB Chromebook when I found this), it's worth the trade-off. I certainly didn't have room for virtual machines (or a lot of other software) anyway.
-
Denilson Sá Maia over 7 years
texlive-full
is a metapackage that pulls all the dependencies, including the documentation. -
Jus12 over 7 yearsIronically, I wanted to free space to make up room for some virtual disks.
-
nealmcb over 7 years@joar That's intended. texlive-full is a metapackage that pulls all the dependencies, including the documentation
-
isarandi almost 5 years@nealmcb, But then autoremove will remove all your tex packages. In more detail: if you had installed tex through texlive-full, and then remove the doc packages, then texlive-full will be gone. Then next time you run
apt-get autoremove
, all your tex packages will be gone as well, because the only reason they were there is because they depended on texlive-full, which is not there any more. -
nealmcb almost 5 years@isarandi If you used texlive-full for installation, that sounds like a good point. Some more refs: 2017 proposal to split out the docs: bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877862 and more data on sizes: reddit.com/r/LaTeX/comments/2naxke/why_is_texlive_so_large
-
shivams almost 5 yearsThis is the best and the most no-fuss answer.
-
Lissanro Rayen almost 5 yearsI get some errors when running suggested command because some documentation files contained spaces. So I added "-print0" to both "find" commands and "-0" to xargs. After this everything worked as expected.
-
Hielke Walinga about 4 yearsIf you want to keep man to work you have to keep the groff and the man stuff. The current instructions as they are now will make man unable to use afterwards.