Resolving a 'both added' merge conflict in git?
Solution 1
If you use git rm
git will remove all versions of that path from the index so your resolve action will leave you without either version.
You can use git checkout --ours src/MyFile.cs
to choose the version from the branch onto which you are rebasing or git checkout --theirs src/MyFile.cs
to choose the version from the branch which you are rebasing.
If you want a blend you need to use a merge tool or edit it manually.
Solution 2
I sometimes find it confusing using the --theirs
and --ours
options to identify where the file will come from. Most of the time mine will be in the branch I am rebasing which is referred to by --theirs
!
You can also use git checkout <tree-ish> -- src/MyFile.cs
Where the <tree-ish>
can be replaced either by the branch name or commit-id that contains the file you wish to keep.
git checkout 6a363d8 -- src/MyFile.cs
git checkout my_branch -- src/MyFile.cs
git checkout HEAD -- src/MyFile.cs
Solution 3
When doing ...
git checkout --ours someFile
It may seem like it didn't do anything when doing git status.
Just Remember to do this afterwards.
git add someFile
git status
Related videos on Youtube
Jez
Long-time coder, with some interest in French and Philosophy. I sometimes hang out in the English Language & Usage chatroom. Check out my Firefox addons! :-)
Updated on July 08, 2022Comments
-
Jez almost 2 years
I'm rebasing in git, and one conflict I get is 'both added' - that is, exactly the same filename has been added independently in my branch, and in the branch I'm rebasing on.
git status
tells me:# Unmerged paths: # (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage) # (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution) # # both added: src/MyFile.cs
My question is, how do I resolve this? Must I use a merge tool or is there a way I can do it just from the commandline? If I
git rm src/MyFile.cs
, how does git know which file version I want to remove and which I want to keep? -
Jez about 12 yearsThanks. And I just realized that the reason the merge tool wasn't working was because git creates the .LOCAL and .REMOTE files for the merge, but not the .BASE file. I think it should just create an empty .BASE file. If you manually create the empty .BASE file, the merge tool works fine.
-
CB Bailey about 12 years@Jez: Please see this thread: thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/188776/…
-
Jez about 12 yearsSo are you saying this will be fixed in a recent version of git?
-
CB Bailey about 12 years@Jez: It's in git versions >= 1.7.9.1 git.kernel.org/?p=git/…
-
pec over 8 yearsFrom @Tom answers : When doing ...
git checkout --ours someFile
It may seem like it didn't do anything when doing git status. Just Remember to do this afterwards.git add someFile
git status
-
aroth over 3 years"the branch onto which you are rebasing" and "the branch which you are rebasing" are really vague. Can't we just assume the common use-case, and use something like "local" and "remote", or "current" and "new"?
-
zhrist over 2 yearsI can not stress how precise and important is this to be understood. Ours and theirs is just hiding what you really want, and that is to point which file you want to use as a resolution when both are added.