RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in greater

101,627

Solution 1

Your problem is caused by the NaN or Inf elements in your out_vec array. You could use the following code to avoid this problem:

if np.isnan(np.sum(out_vec)):
    out_vec = out_vec[~numpy.isnan(out_vec)] # just remove nan elements from vector
out_vec[out_vec > 709] = 709
...

or you could use the following code to leave the NaN values in your array:

out_vec[ np.array([e > 709 if ~np.isnan(e) else False for e in out_vec], dtype=bool) ] = 709

Solution 2

In my case the warning did not show up when calling this before the comparison (I had NaN values getting compared)

np.warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')

Solution 3

IMO the better way would be to use a more numerically stable implementation of sum of exponentials.

from scipy.misc import logsumexp
out_vec = np.exp(out_vec - logsumexp(out_vec))

Solution 4

If this happens because of your NaN value, then this might help:

out_vec[~np.isnan(out_vec)] = out_vec[~np.isnan(out_vec)] > 709

This does the greater operation for none NaN values and the rest remains the same. If you need the rest to be False, then do this too:

out_vec[np.isnan(out_vec)] = False
Share:
101,627
Cheshie
Author by

Cheshie

Updated on February 22, 2020

Comments

  • Cheshie
    Cheshie over 4 years

    I tried to implement soft-max with the following code (out_vec is a numpy vector of floats):

    numerator = np.exp(out_vec)
    denominator = np.sum(np.exp(out_vec))
    out_vec = numerator/denominator
    

    However, I got an overflow error because of np.exp(out_vec). Therefore, I checked (manually) what the upper limit of np.exp() is, and found that np.exp(709) is a number, but np.exp(710) is considered to be np.inf. Thus, to try to avoid the overflow error, I modified my code as follows:

    out_vec[out_vec > 709] = 709 #prevent np.exp overflow
    numerator = np.exp(out_vec)
    denominator = np.sum(np.exp(out_vec))
    out_vec = numerator/denominator
    

    Now, I get a different error:

    RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in greater out_vec[out_vec > 709] = 709
    

    What's wrong with the line I added? I looked up this specific error and all I found is people's advice on how to ignore the error. Simply ignoring the error won't help me, because every time my code encounters this error it does not give the usual results.

  • Cheshie
    Cheshie about 8 years
    Thanks @kvorobiev, but I can't do that - simply removing the elements will cause data loss...
  • scottclowe
    scottclowe over 4 years
    There is no warnings module within numpy, this (np.warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')) is accessing the warnings package built into python's standard library which numpy happens to import. The code is equivalent to import warnings, warnings.filterwarnings('ignore'), and it will suppress all warnings generated by all code (not just numpy) unless you later re-enable warnings.
  • juerg
    juerg over 4 years
    I did the warning suppression too with the warnings module but limited it to the few statements that needed it using: with np.warnings.filterwarnings('ignore'):
  • Marcelo Villa-Piñeros
    Marcelo Villa-Piñeros over 4 years
    np.seterr(invalid='ignore') seems like a better option
  • Nihar Karve
    Nihar Karve about 4 years
    If you want to go the whole hog, try np.seterr(all='raise')
  • Sergiy Sokolenko
    Sergiy Sokolenko over 3 years
    This should be the best answer!