Spy on setTimeout and clearTimeout in Karma and Jasmine

15,451

Solution 1

Edit: Since asking this question, it looks like Jasmine has implemented Clock, which makes this kind of mocking possible. And, as Piotr Jaworski's answer points out, Facebook's Jasmine-based Jest provides its own (arguably much better) way of mocking and spying on timed tasks.

So, the rest of the answer is dated....

The only -- and only -- solution I could find for this is to use Rewire (in my case, I am required to also use Rewire-Webpack).

Rewire does allow you to replace global methods -- but once the method has been replaced, it cannot be spied upon. So, to actually to successfully use toHaveBeenCalledWith, you must wrap and proxy the mock function.

var rewire = require('rewire'),
    myModule = rewire('./path/to/module');

describe(function () {
    var mocks = {
        setTimeout: function () { return 99: },
        clearTimeout: function () {}
    };

    beforeEach(function () {
        // This will work
        myModule.__set__('setTimeout', function () {
            mocks.setTimeout.apply(null, arguments)
        })

        // This will NOT work
        myModule.__set__('clearTimeout', mocks.clearTimeout)
    });

    it('calls setTimeout', function () {
        spyOn(mocks, 'setTimeout').and.callThrough();
        spyOn(mocks, 'clearTimeout').and.callThrough();

        myModule.doSomething(); // this will invoke setTimeout locally

        expect(mocks.setTimeout).toHaveBeenCalledWith(jasmine.any(Function), 1000);
        expect(mocks.clearTimeout).toHaveBeenCalledWith(99); // Won't work (see above)

    });
});

Naturally, this will surely stop working the next time Jasmine, Rewire, Karma, Webpack... or the weather... changes (grrr). If this doesn't work for you, please leave a comment so future devs will know.

Solution 2

I was able to get it to work like this:

spyOn(window, 'setTimeout');
runMyCode();
expect(setTimeout).toHaveBeenCalled();

Just remove the 'window' object from the setTimeout call.

Solution 3

For those looking for a Jest solution, it has dedicated fake timer functions (which are also spyable).

Share:
15,451
Andrew
Author by

Andrew

Since 1998, when I began my professional career in programming and web development, and while working for some of Canada's top media companies,, I've developed the following skills: Team management Site architecture hybrid mobile development (iPhone & Android -- plus BlackBerry while it lasted) SQL (MS SQL Server, MySQL, SQLite) JavaScript (my current focus is React + vanilla, but past work includes Angular, Backbone and jQuery) Node.js .NET & C# Objective C Java (Android) PHP I've also done a good deal of professional work in the past in: Adobe Flash (since version 3.0) ActionScript (original, 2.0 and 3.0) Adobe Air Perl ColdFusion WebTV

Updated on June 21, 2022

Comments

  • Andrew
    Andrew almost 2 years

    I cannot seem to be able to spy on setTimeout and clearTimeout in my Jasmine tests, which are being run through Karma.

    I have tried variations on all of this

    spyOn(window, 'setTimeout').and.callFake(()=>{});
    spyOn(global, 'setTimeout').and.callFake(()=>{});
    spyOn(window, 'clearTimeout').and.callThrough();
    
    clock = jasmine.clock();
    clock.install();
    spyOn(clock, 'setTimeout').and.callThrough();
    
    runMyCode();
    
    expect(window.setTimeout).toHaveBeenCalled(); // no
    expect(global.setTimeout).toHaveBeenCalled(); // nope
    expect(window.clearTimeout).toHaveBeenCalled(); // no again
    expect(clock.setTimeout).toHaveBeenCalled(); // and no
    

    In every case, I can confirm that setTimeout and clearTimeout have been invoked in runMyCode, but instead I always get Expected spy setTimeout to have been called.

    For window, clearly this is because the test and the runner (the Karma window) are in different frames (so why should I expect anything different). But because of this, I can't see any way to confirm that these global functions have been invoked.

    I know that I can use jasmine.clock() to confirm that timeout/interval callbacks have been invoked, but it looks like I can't watch setTimeout itself. And confirming that clearTimeout has been called simply isn't possible.

    At this point, the only thing I can think of is to add a separate layer of abstraction to wrap setTimeout and clearTimeout or to inject the functions as dependencies, which I've done before, but I think is weird.

  • Andrew
    Andrew almost 6 years
    Since asking this question, I've switched to Jest specifically because of how much easier mocking/stubbing is. However, I should also say that in the same time, Jasmine has also implemented its own version, in Clock. The interface is very much different and looks a bit harder to use than Jest.