SQL Server Equivalent of Oracle 'CONNECT BY PRIOR', and 'ORDER SIBLINGS BY'

31,825

Simulating the LEVEL column

The level column can easily be simulated by incrementing a counter in the recursive part:

WITH tree (empid, name, level) AS  (
  SELECT empid, name, 1 as level
  FROM emp
  WHERE name = 'Joan'

  UNION ALL

  SELECT child.empid, child.name, parent.level + 1
  FROM emp as child
    JOIN tree parent on parent.empid = child.mgrid
)
SELECT name 
FROM tree;

Simulating order siblings by

Simulating the order siblings by is a bit more complicated. Assuming we have a column sort_order that defines the order of elements per parent (not the overall sort order - because then order siblings wouldn't be necessary) then we can create a column which gives us an overall sort order:

WITH tree (empid, name, level, sort_path) AS  (
  SELECT empid, name, 1 as level, 
         cast('/' + right('000000' + CONVERT(varchar, sort_order), 6) as varchar(max))
  FROM emp
  WHERE name = 'Joan'

  UNION ALL

  SELECT child.empid, child.name, parent.level + 1, 
         parent.sort_path + '/' + right('000000' + CONVERT(varchar, child.sort_order), 6) 
  FROM emp as child
    JOIN tree parent on parent.empid = child.mgrid
)
SELECT * 
FROM tree
order by sort_path;

The expression for the sort_path looks so complicated because SQL Server (at least the version you are using) does not have a simple function to format a number with leading zeros. In Postgres I would use an integer array so that the conversion to varchar isn't necessary - but that doesn't work in SQL Server either.

Share:
31,825
user1058946
Author by

user1058946

An ex-C# programmer and current Technical Business Analyst by profession, with a keen interest in marketing and advertising. Weird ... I know!

Updated on June 10, 2020

Comments

  • user1058946
    user1058946 almost 4 years

    I've got this Oracle code structure I'm trying to convert to SQL Server 2008 (Note: I have used generic names, enclosed column names and table names within square brackets '[]', and done some formatting to make the code more readable):

    SELECT [col#1], [col#2], [col#3], ..., [col#n], [LEVEL] 
    FROM (SELECT [col#1], [col#2], [col#3], ..., [col#n] 
          FROM [TABLE_1] 
          WHERE ... ) 
    CONNECT BY PRIOR [col#1] = [col#2] 
    START WITH [col#2] IS NULL 
    ORDER SIBLINGS BY [col#3]
    

    What is the SQL Server equivalent template of the above code?

    Specifically, I'm struggling with the LEVEL, and 'ORDER SIBLINGS BY' Oracle constructs.

    Note: The above "code" is the final output from a set of Oracle procedures. Basically, the 'WHERE' clause is built up dynamically and changes depending on various parameters passed. The code block starting with 'CONNECT BY PRIOR' is hard-coded.


    For Reference:

    The Simulation of CONNECT BY PRIOR of ORACLE in SQL SERVER article comes close, but it does not explain how to handle the 'LEVEL' and the 'ORDER SIBLINGS' constructs. ... And my mind is getting in a twist!

    SELECT name 
      FROM emp
      START WITH name = 'Joan'
      CONNECT BY PRIOR empid = mgrid
    

    equates to:

    WITH n(empid, name) AS 
       (SELECT empid, name 
        FROM emp
        WHERE name = 'Joan'
            UNION ALL
        SELECT nplus1.empid, nplus1.name 
        FROM emp as nplus1, n
        WHERE n.empid = nplus1.mgrid)
    SELECT name FROM n
    

    If I have an initial template to work from, it will go a long way to helping me construct SQL Server stored procs to build up a correct T-SQL statement.

    Assistance will be much appreciated.

  • user1058946
    user1058946 almost 9 years
    OK. Thanks, I like that. That's 'LEVEL' sorted. :) Any idea how to handle ORDER SIBLINGS?
  • user1058946
    user1058946 almost 9 years
    Yes! This looks like it might work. Assuming that sort_order column is already just a text string something like 'R301 - Area Management' or 'R402 - Casual Staff' - then it should just work ... I hope. The original Oracle code seems to only sort by the 'child'. It displays the 'parent_code' separately for every line in the results. ... I'm trying this now. :)