String concatenation operator in Oracle, Postgres and SQL Server

23,101

Solution 1

|| is the SQL Standard concatenation operator (see SQL 2008: 5.2). Use that, and complain if it doesn't work in the system you're using ;-)

Seriously though, you should make other systems use ||, not +. Not only is it more standard, but it's easier to accidentally cause confusion if you use +, especially if any types have to be inferred or and implicit casts are happening.

Consider: '5' + 2

If the system you're using doesn't throw an error on that one, and + means both plus and concatenation, you might be in for some confusing results.

Solution 2

You can't overload operators in Oracle. the "+" overload wouldn't work anyway, since Oracle does automatic type conversions ('1'+'1'=2).

The concatenation operator used by Oracle is ||, which is also ANSI-compliant.

There is also the CONCAT function which (as of postgres 9.0 and SQL Server 2012) is supported by all three RDBMSs you need it for.

Note that the Oracle version of CONCAT is not variadic like the other two. If you need to concatenate three or more strings you will need to nest:

CONCAT(s1,CONCAT(s2,s3))

Solution 3

|| certainly works in Oracle, though not apparently SQL Server. (For those who come after us, here's a rosetta stone for SQL: SQL Dialects Reference)

If you're fixing up SQL scripts, I would consider the following solution:

BEFORE:

sql-shell-command < sql-file.sql

(sql-file contains '+' operators)

AFTER:

ansi-sql-shell-command < sql-file.sql


sed -e 's/||/\+/' < sql-file.sql | ms-sql-shell-command

(sql-file contains || operators, you'd have to convert your files)

The idea is that you start with SQL in one format, and for the special case, you run a filter over it to transform it to the other format. Theoretically, you could turn all +es into ||s, but since a good proportion of those might be numeric-add rather than string-concatenation, that's unlikely to work as well.

The complexity of your filter depends on what you're doing. If you have arbitrary data in your SQL, then you'd have to get it to avoid substituting in strings. But if you're setting up views it'll probably be fine.

You could use the same technique in programs where the SQL is in strings - write a function in the program to turn it from one form to the other.

Share:
23,101
Arun P Johny
Author by

Arun P Johny

LinkedIn

Updated on August 20, 2020

Comments

  • Arun P Johny
    Arun P Johny over 3 years

    Is there a way to have a common operator for concatenation in Oracle, Postgres and SQL Server.

    In Oracle and Postgres we use || and SQL Server uses +.

    I've solved the problem in Postgres by adding the custom operator + to support string concatenation.

    Is there a way to add the same operator in Oracle to support string concatenation using the + operator.

  • Arun P Johny
    Arun P Johny over 14 years
    The problem is my current project uses '+' as the string concatenation operator in most of the places. It is works with both postgres ans sql server. Now we want the project to work with oracle also. That is why I need '+' to work in Oracle. If it is not working then we have to change most of our code where we uses '+', to a common operator '||' if it works in all the places. I need a solution which will work in the 3 databases without much changes in the existing system
  • ijw
    ijw over 14 years
    So, Microsoft don't support the same standard as everyone else, and he should complain to MS and tell them to change their ways. Yeah, that'll work... ;-)
  • user3399101
    user3399101 over 10 years
    This function is also available in PostgreSQL 9 : postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/functions-string.html
  • Cerin
    Cerin over 9 years
    @ijw, Or simply "upgrade" to a better database :)
  • Adir D
    Adir D over 9 years
  • codekaizen
    codekaizen over 6 years