The mapper function returned a null value

28,858

The problem comes from RxJava 2, which won't allow null values to be passed down the stream. In particularly your case, you have a mapper function, that returns a null value, which the exception clearly states.

You can reproduce that with following chunk of code:


    Observable.just(1)
              .map(integer -> null)
              .test()
              .assertError(throwable -> 
                    "The mapper function returned a null value.".equals(throwable.getMessage()));

Share:
28,858
Expert wanna be
Author by

Expert wanna be

I want to be IT Expert!

Updated on February 01, 2022

Comments

  • Expert wanna be
    Expert wanna be over 2 years

    I set same build types for debug and release,

    buildTypes {
        debug {
            buildConfigField "String", "API_BASE_URL", "\"https://www.testUrl.com/api/\""
            minifyEnabled true
            shrinkResources true
            proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
            signingConfig signingConfigs.release_key
        }
        release {
            buildConfigField "String", "API_BASE_URL", "\"https://www.testUrl.com/api/\""
            minifyEnabled true
            shrinkResources true
            proguardFiles getDefaultProguardFile('proguard-android.txt'), 'proguard-rules.pro'
            signingConfig signingConfigs.release_key
        }
    }
    

    But If I build with the release, I got the below error. Also, the server response is exactly same.

    W/System.err: java.lang.NullPointerException: The mapper function returned a null value.
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.b.b.a(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.e.b.bs$a.onNext(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.e.b.cm$a.onNext(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at retrofit2.adapter.rxjava2.BodyObservable$BodyObserver.onNext(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at retrofit2.adapter.rxjava2.BodyObservable$BodyObserver.onNext(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at retrofit2.adapter.rxjava2.CallExecuteObservable.subscribeActual(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.l.subscribe(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at retrofit2.adapter.rxjava2.BodyObservable.subscribeActual(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.l.subscribe(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.e.b.cm$a.a(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.e.b.cm.subscribeActual(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.l.subscribe(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.e.b.bs.subscribeActual(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.l.subscribe(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.e.b.bw.subscribeActual(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.l.subscribe(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.e.b.dd$b.run(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.s$a.run(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.g.j.run(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at b.a.e.g.j.call(Unknown Source)
    W/System.err:     at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:237)
    W/System.err:     at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:272)
    W/System.err:     at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1133)
    W/System.err:     at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:607)
    W/System.err:     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:761)
    
  • Benoit
    Benoit over 5 years
    The main problem though is that such a trace does not allow to know which map is returning a null value
  • cosic
    cosic almost 5 years
    Actually you can handle such cases. For more info see article: rongi.github.io/kotlin-blog/rxjava/2017/09/25/…
  • nbroeking
    nbroeking over 4 years
    1. I don't understand how this question was marked duplicate. 2. I don't understand how there is not an answer to this question that helps find which map is returning a null value.
  • RefuX
    RefuX about 4 years
  • Honza Zidek
    Honza Zidek over 2 years
    @RefuX: "I don't understand how this question was marked duplicate." Hmm, a lot of good questions are marked as duplicate. It is based on the laziness of the reviewers - they react just to known keywords :( I marked the question to Reopen, please join me.