The proper way to write a SharePoint User to a User Field in a SharePoint list

15,036

Your assumption is correct, only User Id is a mandatory property when specifying value for a User field.

But since SP.FieldUserValue object is used to store value of User field, it is recommended to get and set values using this object as demonstrated in the below example:

var ctx = SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var web = ctx.get_web();
var lists = web.get_lists();
var list = lists.getByTitle(listTitle);
var item = list.getItemById(itemId);

var assignedToVal = new SP.FieldUserValue();
assignedToVal.set_lookupId(11);   //specify User Id 
item.set_item(fieldName,assignedToVal);
item.update();

ctx.executeQueryAsync(
    function() {
        console.log('Updated');
    },
    function(sender,args) {
        console.log('An error occurred:' + args.get_message());
    }
);
Share:
15,036
Ectropy
Author by

Ectropy

I'm a technology enthusiast, and learning to be a better programmer.

Updated on July 01, 2022

Comments

  • Ectropy
    Ectropy almost 2 years

    I'm writing a user to a SharePoint list.

    I've read that the SharePoint User field has a string like this inside of it: userId;#userLoginName

    I've tried formatting in the same way when writing to a User field, for example when I write this string it works: 9;#i:0#.f|membership|[email protected]

    But what is strange (to me at least) is that 9;# seems to work or even 9. Even if I don't pass the userLoginName info at all, the loginId seems to be enough for it to recognize which User I'm talking about.

    This seems to imply that when writing to the SharePoint User field, you only need the id, and the userLoginName, or, indeed, everything after the loginId is irrelevant.

    Am I correct in my reasoning here? Or perhaps there's unexpected consequences if I leave off the userLoginName information?

  • Ectropy
    Ectropy almost 10 years
    Ok perfect, so rather than just doing newItem.set_item('Manager', "9"); (which is how my current code works) it would be better to do var assignedToVal = new SP.FieldUserValue(); assignedToVal.set_lookupId(9); item.set_item(fieldName,assignedToVal); if I'm following correctly.
  • Vadim Gremyachev
    Vadim Gremyachev almost 10 years
    If user is of type SP.FieldUserValue then user.get_id() returns the UserId
  • Florian Leitgeb
    Florian Leitgeb almost 9 years
    Do not forget to load the sp.js SP.SOD.executeFunc('sp.js', 'SP.ClientContext', loadSPContext);