timespec equivalent for windows
Solution 1
See, for example, How to realise long-term high-resolution timing on windows using C++? and C++ Timer function to provide time in nano seconds.
I have done some testing with Cygwin under Windows XP: on my machine, the granularity of gettimeofday() is about 15 msecs (~1/64 secs). Which is quite coarse. And so is the granularity of:
* clock_t clock(void) (divisor CLOCKS_PER_SEC)
* clock_t times(struct tms *) (divisor sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK))
Both divisors are 1000 (POSIX may have 1000000 for first).
Also, clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME,...) returns 15 msecs, so clock_gettime() is unlikely to help. And CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID don't work.
Other possibilites for Windows might be RDTSC; see the Wikipedia article. And HPET, which isn't available with Windows XP.
Also note in Linux, clock() is the process time, while in Windows it is the wall time.
So some sample code, both for standard Unix, and for CYGWIN code running under Windows, which gives a granularity of about 50 microsecs (on my machine). The return value is in seconds, and gives the number of seconds elapsed since the function was first called. (I belatedly realized this was in an answer I gave over a year ago).
#ifndef __CYGWIN32__
double RealElapsedTime(void) { // returns 0 seconds first time called
static struct timeval t0;
struct timeval tv;
gettimeofday(&tv, 0);
if (!t0.tv_sec)
t0 = tv;
return tv.tv_sec - t0.tv_sec + (tv.tv_usec - t0.tv_usec) / 1000000.;
}
#else
#include <windows.h>
double RealElapsedTime(void) { // granularity about 50 microsecs on my machine
static LARGE_INTEGER freq, start;
LARGE_INTEGER count;
if (!QueryPerformanceCounter(&count))
FatalError("QueryPerformanceCounter");
if (!freq.QuadPart) { // one time initialization
if (!QueryPerformanceFrequency(&freq))
FatalError("QueryPerformanceFrequency");
start = count;
}
return (double)(count.QuadPart - start.QuadPart) / freq.QuadPart;
}
#endif
Solution 2
Portable between Windows, UNIX, Linux and anything vaguely modern: std::chrono::high_resolution_clock
. Resolution may vary, but you can find out at compile time what it is. Nanoseconds is certainly possible on modern hardware.
Keep in mind that nanosecond precision really means a sub-meter precision. A nanosecond at lightspeed is only 30 centimeters. Moving your computer from the top of rack to the bottom is literally moving it by several nanoseconds.
Quillion
I love programming. At this point programming for me is essential part of everyday life! It has become essential extension of me and regardless of what I do I can not be thinking about programming. And I love it!!! My kids ask me what programming is, and I say: Programming is like being a magician, you write a spell and it does magic.
Updated on June 21, 2022Comments
-
Quillion almost 2 years
I am porting my application to
windows
fromunix
and I have run into a wall. In my application I need to find time in microseconds (the whole application heavily depends on it due to it being a high precision application).Previously I was using
timespec
structure, but windows contains no such thing. The commandGetTickCount
does not suffice because it returns time in milliseconds. I was also thinking ofQueryPerformanceFrequency
.Would anyone happen to know something that is as identical to
timespec
as possible?In the future I might even require nanoseconds too, which nothing I have searched in windows supports.
-
Quillion over 12 yearsAll in all it seems like a solid answer, but I can't seem to figure out what why a double value will be returned or what it will represent. I understand that you find difference and then divide by frequency. So if I assume that double value is in seconds, then in order to find microseconds I have to multiply by 1 million (1 000 000). Is that right?
-
Joseph Quinsey over 12 yearsThe return value is in
seconds
, and gives the number of seconds elapsed since the function was first called. -
Joseph Quinsey over 12 yearsThe GNU C Lib Manual notes there are
"some peculiar operating systems where the tv_sec member has an unsigned type."
For these, the above code needs a cast, or the assumption that the clock never runs backwards. -
Joseph Quinsey over 12 yearsAnd see Micro Second resolution timestamps on windows, especially Andras Vass's answer.
-
Quillion over 12 yearsOh this is excellent. Thank you very much for all your help! I really appreciate it!