Unable to map an HttpHandler to a "path/*" wildcard mapping

30,729

Solution 1

The URLRoutingModule-4.0 is a catch all handler listed before your nancy handler. It will thus come into play before your handler is ever hit. You can remove the handlers add yours and add them back in like so:

<handlers>
    <remove name="BlockViewHandler" />
    <remove name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" />
    <add verb="*" path="robots.txt" name="robots" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler"/>
    ... custom handlers here
    <add name="Nancy" path="api/*" verb="*" type="Nancy.Hosting.Aspnet.NancyHttpRequestHandler" allowPathInfo="true" />
    ... now add back UrlRoutingModule and BlockViewHandler
    <add path="*" verb="*" name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" type="System.Web.Routing.UrlRoutingModule, System.Web, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" preCondition="managedHandler" />
    <add name="BlockViewHandler" path="*" verb="*" preCondition="integratedMode" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler" /> 
</handlers>

You can see the handler order in IIS7 under Handler Mappings select View Ordered List and it will list the order in which it loads the handlers top (first) to bottom (last).

You might need a second Web.config in your /api folder

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
    <system.web>
      <httpHandlers>
        <clear />
        <add name="Nancy" path="*" verb="*" type="Nancy.Hosting.Aspnet.NancyHttpRequestHandler" allowPathInfo="true" />
      </httpHandlers>
    </system.web>
</configuration>

Similarly, this is what I usually do for "/static" content on websites. I have not found out how to circumvent the need for the seconds web.config.

EDIT

I had a hard time figuring this out when i had to as well and it seems my memory hasnt served me well. I dont specify a path/* handler anywhere instead I have this:

(only specifying simple wildcards/fully qualified paths to go around UrlRouting)

<location path="." inheritInChildApplications="false">
    <system.webServer>
        <!--
        ml: in .NET 4.0 its now safe to remove  from the modules section.
        Make sure you have a *. mapping to a ExtensionLessUrl hanlder in IIS
        this should improve performance a tad albeit neglectable.

        see: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/tmarq/archive/2010/04/01/asp-net-4-0-enables-routing-of-extensionless-urls-without-impacting-static-requests.aspx
        -->

        <validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false" />
        <modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="false" />
        <handlers>
            <remove name="BlockViewHandler" />
            <remove name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" />
            <add verb="*" path="robots.txt" name="robots" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler"/>
            .. Some company handlers i can't list 
            <add path="*" verb="*" name="UrlRoutingModule-4.0" type="System.Web.Routing.UrlRoutingModule, System.Web, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" preCondition="managedHandler" />
            <add name="BlockViewHandler" path="*" verb="*" preCondition="integratedMode" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler" />
        </handlers>
    </system.webServer>
</location>

Then in my /Content/web.config file I set the following:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<configuration>
    <system.webServer>
        <handlers>
            <clear />
            <add name="StaticFiles" path="*" verb="*" modules="StaticFileModule" resourceType="Either" requireAccess="None" />
        </handlers>
        <staticContent>
            <clientCache cacheControlMaxAge ="31.00:00:00" cacheControlMode="UseMaxAge" />
        </staticContent>
    </system.webServer>
</configuration>

My handler list for /Content/ looks like this now:

Handler list

Which is about as sure as I can be anything in /Content/ will be served through StaticFileModule. The trick here seems to be specifying: inheritInChildApplications="false".

Solution 2

Simple. Just put the path, no wildcard.

<handlers>
  <add name="Nancy" path="api" verb="*" type="Nancy.Hosting.Aspnet.NancyHttpRequestHandler" allowPathInfo="true" />
</handlers>

This will match:

/api/{anything}

Solution 3

Seems the UrlRoutingModule-4.0 is more trouble than it is worth. Instead I've just told MVC3 to ignore the routes. Not a perfect solution but until I have something that works better I'll have to stick with this in RegisterRoutes:

routes.IgnoreRoute("api/{*route}");
Share:
30,729

Related videos on Youtube

Chris Nicola
Author by

Chris Nicola

Software developer, Rails, Ruby, Javascript, etc. I am mostly involved web development and general systems design work but have also built a couple of end-to-end LOB applications. CTO and co-founder of WealthBar which provides customized personal financial advice and investments for Canadians.

Updated on June 11, 2020

Comments

  • Chris Nicola
    Chris Nicola about 4 years

    So I've been trying to map an http module to a sub-path of an MVC3 site. It should be pretty simple as I understand it, but it has not been working. The module is setup like so:

    <handlers>
      <add name="Nancy" path="api/*" verb="*" type="Nancy.Hosting.Aspnet.NancyHttpRequestHandler" allowPathInfo="true" />
    </handlers>
    

    A matching section is also there for iis6 so I can run it under webdev.webserver. However testing both deploying to my local iis7 (under Win7) and with webdev.webserver, only /api actually calls the handler. If I call /api/{anything} it just returns a 404.

    I'm sure I'm just "doing it wrong (tm)" but any help would be appreciated.

    Note: I've also tried a couple other configurations including using a tag and creating a /api folder and adding a web.config to that folder with a full wildcard.

  • terjetyl
    terjetyl over 12 years
    Seems to be working nicely. Have you found any downsides doing it this way?
  • Chris Nicola
    Chris Nicola over 12 years
    None so far, been using it in production for quite a while now.
  • prabir
    prabir over 12 years
    you might also want to add routes.IgnoreRoute("_Nancy/{*route}"); if you are using nancy v0.10+ to enable diagnostics.
  • ThinkingStiff
    ThinkingStiff about 11 years
    @ChrisNicola I use this for all my HttpHandlers for API. Works perfectly.
  • JDC
    JDC about 11 years
    This is the best answer in my opinion.
  • Bill Gillingham
    Bill Gillingham over 9 years
    This did work for me - serving jpgs from one handler (that I resize/stream dynamically) and js/png/etc from a second handler.