Where do you normally keep your UNIX/Linux scripts?
Solution 1
Personal ones for my account, ~/bin
. System-wide ones go in /usr/local/bin
or /usr/local/sbin
as appropriate (scripts which should only be run as root go in sbin
, while scripts intended to help ordinary users go in bin
), rolled out via configuration management to ensure that all machines that need them have them (and the latest versions, too).
Solution 2
For more complex stuff, especially something that could be shared between multiple machines I tend to make distribution packages, Debian in my case. I use /usr/bin
, and give scripts some common prefix. That way it's easier to deploy and keep track of them. For my personal stuff, ~/bin
is good enough.
Solution 3
At the moment I use ~/bin for my personal (quick and dirty :P) scripts and /usr/local/bin (or sbin) for system wide ones
Both directories are under revision control via git.
Solution 4
I currently use /usr/local/$company/scripts for system-wide scripts, and ~/bin for personal. I also have a ~/code folder that contains work-in-progress stuff.
Solution 5
I use ~/.bin
The folder is hidden for file managers and ls
: i rarely modify anything inside, so let it be :)
Related videos on Youtube
Comments
-
AB.S almost 2 years
There are numerous scripts that I have written for my server. Some of them are in my
~/scripts
and some of them are in application directories.I am just wondering is there a directory that you would normally use to keep your shell scripts?
-
David Pashley almost 15 years+1 This is exactly what I do.
-
Dan Carley almost 15 yearsYou should explain the appropriateness of
bin
versussbin
:) -
wazoox almost 15 yearssbin is meant for "Superuser BINaries", programs that usually need root access to run properly. "bin" is for all the rest.
-
kmarsh almost 15 yearsThe origin of sbin came from "Statically-linked BINaries". When /usr (and its shared libraries) were mounted outside of single-user mode, it was found necessary to keep around some statically linked programs (sh, tar) that always worked. Since only the SysAdmin was interested in these binaries, the misnomer began.
-
Admin almost 15 yearsI wondered about that too, I fear none of my scripts are worthy of the distinction :)
-
Return_Of_The_Archons almost 15 yearsIs there a good guide somewhere for packaging (for Debian) simple scripts?
-
cas almost 15 yearsi do the same, except s/git/svn/
-
David Gardner almost 15 yearsI do the same thing but with an extra level of directory for $ARCH -- so ~/pub/$ARCH/{bin,man,share} to allow for i386, x86_64 and any other architectures you have binaries for (I used to use SGI machines and various Sparcs, so this was more useful then :)