Why are global variables considered bad practice?

38,460

Solution 1

They clutter up the global namespace and are slower to look up than local variables.

First of all, having many global variables is always a bad thing because it's easy to forget you declared a variable somewhere and accidentally re-declare it somewhere else. If your first variable was local then you don't have a problem. If it was global, then it just got overwritten. This gets even worse when you get into implied globals (e.g. when you say someVar = someValue without declaring someVar with the var keyword).

Secondly, global variables take longer for Javascript to "find" than local variables. The difference in speed isn't huge, but it does exist.

For further reading and a more in-depth explanation of why globals are considered bad practice, you may want to check out this page.

Solution 2

Global variables can significantly increase coupling, significantly reduces the scalability and testability of your code. Once you start using globals, you now have to know where and how the variable is modified (i.e. breaking encapsulation). Most of the literature and conventions out there will argue that performance is the least of your concerns when using globals.

This is a fantastic article outlining why global variables cause headaches.

Solution 3

In a nutshell, Global variables cause (and more) the following issues.

1) Variable naming collisions - If you're working on a team and both yourself and your co-worker use the same variable name on the global scope, the variable defined last will overwrite the initial variable. This obvious can have devastating consequences.

2) Security - Specifically on the web, every user has access to the Window (or global) object. By putting variables on the global scope, you give any user the ability to see or change your variables.

3) Slower - This is arguably negligible, but it still exists. The way JavaScript variable lookups work is the JavaScript engine will do a lookup on the current scope the variable is being looked up in. If it can't find it, it will do a look up on the next parent scope. If it doesn't find it there, it will continue looking upward until it reaches the global object looking for that variable. If all of your variables are located on the global scope, the JavaScript engine will always have to go through every scope in order to finally reach the global scope to find the variable.

Solution 4

If your script is very long and you use these variables from lots of functions it will increase your debugging time since the value of the global variable could have been changed from anywhere so if you are tracking where this changed to a non-expected value you'll have to check them all.

This scenario is even more painful if different programmers modify this variable from other scripts included in your page.

Solution 5

There shouldn't be any problem using global variables in your code as long as you are wrapping them inside a uniqe namespase/object (to avoid collision with scripts that are not yours)

There is one adventage of using global variable in javascript, and it derives from the fact that javascript is not a strong type language. there for, if you pass somes complex objects as arguments to a function, you will probebly lose all the intellisence for those objects (inside the function scope.) while using global objects insteads, will preserve that intellisence. and when you have intelisence, it actually can improve the debugging time (as opposed to what others said...)

I personally find that very usful and it certainly have place in my code.

(of course, one should alwayse make the right balance between locals and globals variables)

Share:
38,460
user1318416
Author by

user1318416

Updated on April 26, 2020

Comments

  • user1318416
    user1318416 about 4 years

    I keep seeing warnings not to use global variables in JavaScript, but it seems that the only reason people say that is because the clogs up the global namespace. I can imagine this being easily fixed by putting all of the variables into one big object. Now the question is: are there any other reasons not to use global variables other than convenience sake? Are there any performance or compatibility issues involved with them?

  • Dan Dascalescu
    Dan Dascalescu over 9 years
    Harder debugging is only one reason why globals are bad. Other are listed at Why are globals so evil.
  • user3069232
    user3069232 almost 4 years
    If you re-declare it you will get a compiler error. But I know what you mean, you mean if you re-use it in the wrong place your code will most lightly fail and you'll be mystified as to what went wrong.