Why won't re.groups() give me anything for my one correctly-matched group?

63,054

Solution 1

groups is empty since you do not have any capturing groups - http://docs.python.org/library/re.html#re.MatchObject.groups. group(0) will always returns the whole text that was matched regardless of if it was captured in a group or not

Edited.

Solution 2

To the best of my knowledge, .groups() returns a tuple of remembered groups. I.e. those groups in the regular expression that are enclosed in parentheses. So if you were to write:

print re.search(r'(1)', '1').groups()

you would get

('1',)

as your response. In general, .groups() will return a tuple of all the groups of objects in the regular expression that are enclosed within parentheses.

Solution 3

The reason for this is that you have no capturing groups (since you don't use () in the pattern). http://docs.python.org/library/re.html#re.MatchObject.groups

And group(0) returns the entire search result (even if it has no capturing groups at all): http://docs.python.org/library/re.html#re.MatchObject.group

Solution 4

You have no groups in your regex, therefore you get an empty list (()) as result.

Try

re.search(r'(1)', '1').groups()

With the brackets you are creating a capturing group, the result that matches this part of the pattern, is stored in a group.

Then you get

('1',)

as result.

Share:
63,054
dtc
Author by

dtc

mutters something about air of mystery

Updated on August 05, 2022

Comments

  • dtc
    dtc over 1 year

    When I run this code:

    print re.search(r'1', '1').groups() 
    

    I get a result of (). However, .group(0) gives me the match.

    Shouldn't groups() give me something containing the match?

    Update: Thanks for the answers. So that means if I do re.search() with no subgroups, I have to use groups(0) to get a match?