building nested lists in R

34,214

Solution 1

There's another way to assign to a list, using my_list[[name or number]] <-. If you really want to do that in a loop, just looping over things with names like iter1, iter2, ...

A <- list()
n_iter <- 2
for (i in 1:n_iter){
    iname <- paste("iter",i,sep="")
    A[[iname]] <- get(iname)
}

As @mnel pointed out, dynamically growing a list is inefficient. The alternative is, I think, to use lapply:

n_iter <- 2
inames <- paste("iter",1:n_iter,sep="")
names(inames) <- inames
A <- lapply(inames,get)

This can also be done with a data frame, which would be a better format if your sublists always have two elements, each having a consistent class (item1 being numeric and item 2 being character).

n_iter <- 2
DF <- data.frame(item1=rep(0,n_iter),item2=rep("",n_iter),stringsAsFactors=FALSE)
for (i in 1:n_iter){
     iname <- paste("iter",i,sep="")
     DF[i,] <- get(iname)
     rownames(DF)[i] <- iname
}

#       item1 item2
# iter1     1     a
# iter2     1     b

However, that's a pretty ugly way of doing things; things get messy pretty quickly when using get. With your data structure, maybe you want to create iter1 and iter2 in a loop and immediately embed them into the parent list or data frame?

n_iter = 10
DF <- data.frame(item1 = rep(0,n_iter), item2 = rep("",n_iter))
for (i in 1:n_iter){
    ... do stuff to make anum and achar ...
    DF[i,"item1"] <- anum
    DF[i,"item2"] <- achar
}

Where anum and achar are the values of item1 and item2 you want to store from that iteration. Elsewhere on SO, they say that there is an alternative using the data.table package that is almost 10x as fast/efficient as this sort of data-frame assignment.

Oh, one last idea: if you want to put them in a list first, you can easily convert to a data frame later with

DF <- do.call(rbind.data.frame,A)

Solution 2

This gets you the equivalent of your All

c(iter1=list(iter1), iter2=list(iter2))

> identical(c(iter1=list(iter1), iter2=list(iter2)), All)
[1] TRUE

Let's say you'd like to add a third list to All:

c(All, list(iter3=iter3))

If you don't care for the list names, it looks a little cleaner

 c(list(iter1), list(iter2))

Solution 3

I think @Frank's answer is the correct one here, but the first example he gave seemed a little strange. I think you want to do this...

bigLL <- list()
for( i in 1:3 ){

  ll <- list( item1 = i , item2 = letters[i] )
  bigLL[[i]] <- ll

}

bigLL
#[[1]]
#[[1]]$item1
#[1] 1

#[[1]]$item2
#[1] "a"


#[[2]]
#[[2]]$item1
#[1] 2

#[[2]]$item2
#[1] "b"


#[[3]]
#[[3]]$item1
#[1] 3

#[[3]]$item2
#[1] "c"

but you should consider the alternatives by Frank if possible.

Share:
34,214
Sam
Author by

Sam

Updated on December 16, 2020

Comments

  • Sam
    Sam over 3 years

    I have written a function that it's output is a list. I want to put my function into a loop and I'd like to store output of each iteration (which is of course a list) into a bigger list. In other words, each element of this BIG list is also a list. c() does not do what I want. Is there any way to do that?

    To understand better what I'm asking, consider the example below:

    iter1 <- list(item1 = 1, item2 = "a")
    iter2 <- list(item1 = 1, item2 = "b")
    All <- list(iter1 = iter1, iter2 = iter2)
    

    I want to be able to do something similar to the code above but in a loop. How can I do that?

    Thanks for your help,

  • Frank
    Frank almost 11 years
    @SimonO101 . Thanks for pointing out the issue with my first example. :) Please let me know if there's a problem with the edited version.
  • Simon O'Hanlon
    Simon O'Hanlon almost 11 years
    + 1 for your comprehensive treatment of the alternatives
  • CJB
    CJB over 8 years
    rbind is not for lists - it will ignore the fact that data starts as a list. Also, continually calling rbind in a loop is slow as data must be re-evaluated at each step. Try using data[[i]] <- tmp in each loop and then do.call(rbind, data) after the loop.