Cloud Build fails to deploy to Google App Engine - You do not have permission to act as @appspot.gserviceaccount.com
Solution 1
According to the provided error, it seems like you need to add some delegation to your service account. This means that the service account can act on behalf of another service account. Do not add this permission on the project level, since it poses a security risk! Below you can find an example of how to add roles/iam.serviceAccountUser
on another service account.
PROJECT_ID=xxxxxx
PROJECT_NUMBER=$(gcloud projects list \
--format="value(projectNumber)" \
--filter="projectId=${PROJECT_ID}")
gcloud iam service-accounts add-iam-policy-binding \
${PROJECT_ID}@appspot.gserviceaccount.com \
--member=serviceAccount:${PROJECT_NUMBER}@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com \
--role=roles/iam.serviceAccountUser \
--project=${PROJECT_ID}
To summarize, the service account must have the iam.serviceAccounts.actAs
permission, which is included in the roles/iam.serviceAccountUser
role. Updated Google documentation can be found here.
Solution 2
I had the same issue. For me I had to add the Service Account User role to my circle ci user in IAM. Maybe you can do the same for cloudbuild.
Solution 3
I grant Service Account User
permission to my CI/CD service account. That works.
Screenshot of my Gitlab CI/CD configuration
Solution 4
First we go to the permission manager and select the project that we want to add permissions.; https://console.cloud.google.com/iam-admin/
Solution 5
To resolve this issue, you can add Service Account User
IAM permission to your CI/CD pipeline service account.
Eg. If you're using Cloud Build, then add Service Account User
role to your {project-number}@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com
service account
Admin
Updated on June 06, 2022Comments
-
Admin almost 2 years
This morning I made a PR which triggered a Cloud Build for my staging enviroment but failed to deploy the results to GAE.
The error was as follows:
ERROR: (gcloud.app.deploy) PERMISSION_DENIED: You do not have permission to act as '[redacted]@appspot.gserviceaccount.com' Step #4: - '@type': type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.ResourceInfo Step #4: description: You do not have permission to act as this service account. Step #4: resourceName: [redacted]@appspot.gserviceaccount.com Step #4: resourceType: serviceAccount
When I look at https://console.cloud.google.com/cloud-build/settings/service-account Cloud build has the follow service account permissions ENABLED:
- App Engine Admin
- Cloud KMS
Checking https://console.cloud.google.com/iam-admin/iam I can see that the cloudbuild service account has the following roles:
- App Engine Admin
- App Engine Deployer
- Cloud Build Service Account
- Cloud KMS CryptoKey Decrypter
-
stevehipwell over 3 yearsThis worked for me too, it looks like something has changed but the docs are up to date with the roles required for automation. cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/python/roles
-
Mayeu over 3 yearsJust giving the Service Account the "Service Account User" role is too broad, and basically gives admin right on the project to your deployer/cloudbuild service account. One should use
gcloud iam service-accounts add-iam-policy-binding
to bind the role only to the '[redacted]@appspot.gserviceaccount.com' SA. See answer from Nebulastic. -
Mayeu over 3 yearsSince this morning (2020-10-09) some of our deployment started to fails and this solved it. In our case we are using:
gcloud --quiet --project "$GOOGLE_PROJECT_NAME" app deploy app.yaml
and the deployment have previously been working for months. -
nzhenry over 3 yearsIf you get this error,
ERROR: (gcloud.iam.service-accounts.add-iam-policy-binding) INVALID_ARGUMENT: The member <project-number>@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com is of an unknown type. Please set a valid type prefix for the member.
insertserviceAccount:
before <project-number> -
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsTotally agree with @Mayeu, this way your cloudbuild service account can perform almost any action within the project, not a best practice. The scope should be only the service account for which permissions need to be delegated.
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsUpdated the snippet so you don't have to look up the project number anymore.
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsThis is basically over-permissioning, since the service account can now act on behalf of all the other service accounts within the project. See my answer for the solution.
-
Adam P. Goucher over 3 years@Nebulastic The commands I'm using are here -- gitlab.com/apgoucher/catagolue/-/blob/master/… -- and the failed job output is here -- gitlab.com/apgoucher/catagolue/-/jobs/783798218 Shih-En Chou's solution of adding Service Account User to the gitlab service account solved the problem.
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsYes but your permissions are on the project level and should be on the service account level. Saying "it works" is not always the best solution.
-
Kavinda Keshan Rasnayake over 3 yearsWhere do we add this part? I am quite a beginner, so I am not sure where to add this.
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsYou can execute this on the command line with the gcloud sdk.
-
Oldrich Dlouhy over 3 yearsI have filled an issue on Google issue tracker (see issuetracker.google.com/issues/170538212) for this issue and in the response Google confirmed the serviceAccountUser role is now required. They also updated the documentation at cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/flexible/nodejs/…
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsYep, this is because of cloudbuild poses a possible security risk, so I bet they are closing off some known vulnerabilities.
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsThis role is way too broad. You should only specify it on the service account level. Otherwise, anyone using cloudbuild can act as another service account, posing serious security issues.
-
MeLight over 3 yearsI user CircleCI and approve of this solution
-
X09 over 3 years@Nebulastic Thanks for this answer. Please, where are we supposed to run this command, on the local machine or CD pipeline? I ran it on my local machine, and rerun the workflow but it's still spitting out the error.
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsPlease be more specific about your error, so others can help. You could run this command locally or in your pipeline. The same logic can also be applied in Deployment Manager or Terraform if you use those.
-
X09 over 3 yearsI got this error from Github Action:
ERROR: (gcloud.app.deploy) PERMISSION_DENIED: You do not have permission to act as ‘[email protected]’ - ‘@type’: type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.ResourceInfo description: You do not have permission to act as this service account. resourceName: [email protected] resourceType: serviceAccount
So I came here, got your answer and ran the command on the terminal on my machine. Afterwards, I retried the workflow but the error above still occurred. I am deploying to App Engine. -
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsYou have to set the permissions for the service account you are using in github actions, to "act as" the appspot service account.
-
X09 over 3 yearsThanks for the reply. Please, how do I do that?
-
X09 over 3 yearsNever mind, I found the answer here: stackoverflow.com/a/61336174/6181476. Thanks, man!
-
Cloudkollektiv over 3 yearsAlthough this would work, you are creating a serious security issue here. Never set the Service Account User role in the project IAM, since it allows a user account to act as any other user account.
-
Adam John over 3 yearsNebulastic feels strongly enough to post the same comment about over-permission-ing in 3 different places in this thread. While I agree with the point - so far no one has posted a viable alternative solution ... this means people will over-permission, until an alternative is proposed.
-
Adam John over 3 yearsArguably it is NOT clear - since I discovered this post via Google Fu which I am SURE others have as well... hence my sharing of helpful information highly related to the post in the spirit of supporting the community, @Nebulastic.
-
ahong about 3 years@OldrichDlouhy thanks for filing the issue. It is pretty annoying that they would make these changes without more notice.
-
Cloudkollektiv about 3 yearsI am actually very confident that you should not put this as a project role, but as a service account binding! This is exactly what I described in my post.