Convert Promise to Observable

235,061

Solution 1

If you are using RxJS 6.0.0:

import { from } from 'rxjs';
const observable = from(promise);

Solution 2

1 Direct Execution / Conversion

Use from to directly convert a previously created Promise to an Observable.

import { from } from 'rxjs';

// getPromise() is called once, the promise is passed to the Observable
const observable$ = from(getPromise());

observable$ will be a hot Observable that effectively replays the Promises value to Subscribers.

It's a hot Observable because the producer (in this case the Promise) is created outside of the Observable. Multiple subscribers will share the same Promise. If the inner Promise has been resolved a new subscriber to the Observable will get its value immediately.

2 Deferred Execution On Every Subscribe

Use defer with a Promise factory function as input to defer the creation and conversion of a Promise to an Observable.

import { defer } from 'rxjs';

// getPromise() is called every time someone subscribes to the observable$
const observable$ = defer(() => getPromise());

observable$ will be a cold Observable.

It's a cold Observable because the producer (the Promise) is created inside of the Observable. Each subscriber will create a new Promise by calling the given Promise factory function.

This allows you to create an observable$ without creating and thus executing a Promise right away and without sharing this Promise with multiple subscribers. Each subscriber to observable$ effectively calls from(promiseFactory()).subscribe(subscriber). So each subscriber creates and converts its own new Promise to a new Observable and attaches itself to this new Observable.

3 Many Operators Accept Promises Directly

Most RxJS operators that combine (e.g. merge, concat, forkJoin, combineLatest ...) or transform observables (e.g. switchMap, mergeMap, concatMap, catchError ...) accept promises directly. If you're using one of them anyway you don't have to use from to wrap a promise first (but to create a cold observable you still might have to use defer).

// Execute two promises simultaneously
forkJoin(getPromise(1), getPromise(2)).pipe(
  switchMap(([v1, v2]) => v1.getPromise(v2)) // map to nested Promise
)

Check the documentation or implementation to see if the operator you're using accepts ObservableInput or SubscribableOrPromise.

type ObservableInput<T> = SubscribableOrPromise<T> | ArrayLike<T> | Iterable<T>;
// Note the PromiseLike ----------------------------------------------------v
type SubscribableOrPromise<T> = Subscribable<T> | Subscribable<never> | PromiseLike<T> | InteropObservable<T>;

The difference between from and defer in an example: https://stackblitz.com/edit/rxjs-6rb7vf

const getPromise = val => new Promise(resolve => {
  console.log('Promise created for', val);
  setTimeout(() => resolve(`Promise Resolved: ${val}`), 5000);
});

// the execution of getPromise('FROM') starts here, when you create the promise inside from
const fromPromise$ = from(getPromise('FROM'));
const deferPromise$ = defer(() => getPromise('DEFER'));

fromPromise$.subscribe(console.log);
// the execution of getPromise('DEFER') starts here, when you subscribe to deferPromise$
deferPromise$.subscribe(console.log);

defer is probably the operator most people are looking for as many apps rely on Observables to be cold and trigger a data fetch on subscribe. from is still a viable option for certain use cases though, e.g. when you want to create a Promise once during some initialisation process and then propagate its value via an Observable that will be subscribed to multiple times, but don't want to create and execute the Promise again for every subscriber.

Solution 3

try this:

import 'rxjs/add/observable/fromPromise';
import { Observable } from "rxjs/Observable";

const subscription = Observable.fromPromise(
    firebase.auth().createUserWithEmailAndPassword(email, password)
);
subscription.subscribe(firebaseUser => /* Do anything with data received */,
                       error => /* Handle error here */);

you can find complete reference to fromPromise operator here.

Solution 4

The correct pattern to transform a promise into an observable is using defer and from operators:

import { defer, from } from 'rxjs';
    
const observable$ = defer(() => from(myPromise()));

Why we need the defer operator?

Promises are eager, this means that when called they fire instantly. This is the opposite from how observables work. Observables are lazy, they are only fired when .subscribe() is called. This is the reason we need to always wrap it into a defer operator. The from operator doesn't do this work, so defer is always needed.

Solution 5

You can add a wrapper around promise functionality to return an Observable to observer.

  • Creating a Lazy Observable using defer() operator which allows you to create the Observable only when the Observer subscribes.
import { of, Observable, defer } from 'rxjs'; 
import { map } from 'rxjs/operators';


function getTodos$(): Observable<any> {
  return defer(()=>{
    return fetch('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/1')
      .then(response => response.json())
      .then(json => {
        return json;
      })
  });
}

getTodos$().
 subscribe(
   (next)=>{
     console.log('Data is:', next);
   }
)

Share:
235,061
Krishnan Sriram
Author by

Krishnan Sriram

Updated on December 03, 2021

Comments

  • Krishnan Sriram
    Krishnan Sriram over 2 years

    I am trying to wrap my head around observables. I love the way observables solve development and readability issues. As I read, benefits are immense.

    Observables on HTTP and collections seem to be straight forward. How can I convert something like this to observable pattern.

    This is from my service component, to provide authentication. I'd prefer this to work like other HTTP services in Angular2 - with support for data, error and completion handlers.

    firebase.auth().createUserWithEmailAndPassword(email, password)
      .then(function(firebaseUser) {
        // do something to update your UI component
        // pass user object to UI component
      })
      .catch(function(error) {
        // Handle Errors here.
        var errorCode = error.code;
        var errorMessage = error.message;
        // ...
      });
    

    Any help here would be much appreciated. The only alternative solution I had was to create EventEmitters. But I guess that's a terrible way to do things in services section

  • polkovnikov.ph
    polkovnikov.ph over 5 years
    Subjects are low-level machinery. Don't use subjects, except for the cases when you're extending rxjs.
  • Shivang Gupta
    Shivang Gupta over 5 years
    I am just giving a solution.
  • polkovnikov.ph
    polkovnikov.ph over 5 years
    You could have at least shown new Observable(observer => { ... observer.next() ... }) way to implement it. Even though it would be a reimplementation of existing well-known function, it would directly answer the question and wouldn't be harmful to readers.
  • Laxmikant Dange
    Laxmikant Dange over 5 years
    Using 6.3.3, from method returning observable but it is sending promise as value to subscriptions. :(
  • Starscream
    Starscream over 4 years
    I think that difference is capital, thanks for pointing it out.
  • VSO
    VSO over 4 years
    This answer is corrext for RXJS 6+. I tried to import from operators via "intuition" - I was wrong.
  • BobbyTables
    BobbyTables almost 4 years
    Thanks for sharing that many operators accept promises directly! TIL
  • janw
    janw over 3 years
    While this code may solve the question, including an explanation of how and why this solves the problem would really help to improve the quality of your post, and probably result in more up-votes. Remember that you are answering the question for readers in the future, not just the person asking now. Please edit your answer to add explanations and give an indication of what limitations and assumptions apply.
  • helhum
    helhum over 3 years
    Thank you very much for this detailed writeup! It not only helped me to solve my problem, but also helped me to better understand the concepts.
  • Torsten Barthel
    Torsten Barthel over 2 years
    The operator is asking the opposite
  • Llorenç Pujol Ferriol
    Llorenç Pujol Ferriol over 2 years
    This answer is not correct, it would work only sometimes. Promises are eager, and observables are lazy (don't start until subscribe). With this solution, the promise has already started even there is no '.subscribe()', so it does not behave like an observable. See answer stackoverflow.com/a/69360357/6099651 for a better solution.