Does pandas need to close connection?
16,362
Solution 1
Looking at the source code, I can't find a con.close()
method on any SQL connection object, only the cursor
objects for the queries.
I'd close for safe-measure. Whether you do that using with
or not is up to you.
Solution 2
For anyone who finds this question and wonders how to close the connection in this example, the following method worked for me: engine.dispose()
Author by
deez
Updated on June 04, 2022Comments
-
deez almost 2 years
When using pandas "read_sql_query", do I need to close the connection? Or should I use a "with" statement? Or can I just use the following and be good?
from sqlalchemy import create_engine import pandas as pd sql = """ SELECT * FROM Table_Name; """ engine = create_engine('blah') df = pd.read_sql_query(sql, engine) print df.head()
-
juanpa.arrivillaga about 7 yearsYeah, to me is wouldn't make sense to close the connection if it is taking the connection as an argument.
-
OneCricketeer about 7 yearsRight, because it would need to re-open for subsequent queries.
-
hoyland about 7 yearsConnections should generally close when they go out of scope. That said, it's better to close connections when appropriate.
-
chjortlund over 3 yearsFor good measure, here is the reference to official SQLAlchemy documentation with additional explanation: docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/13/core/connections.html#engine-disposal