Having multiple get-methods with multiple query string parameters in ASP.NET Core Web Api
First of all you are mixing RouteParameters and QueryParameters.
This:
[HttpGet]
[Route("{xCoordinate}/{yCoordinate}")]
public IActionResult GetByCoordinates([FromQuery]decimal xCoordinate, [FromQuery]decimal yCoordinate)
{
var model = _availabilityService.FindByCoordinates(xCoordinate, yCoordinate);
return Ok(model);
}
maps the controller action GetByCoordinates
to a route like this:
/api/1.0/availabilities/34.3444/66.3422
But you are also specifying that you are expecting xCoordinate
and yCoordinate
to be bound from query parameters. So above url would match the action, but xCoordinate
and yCoordinate
would be bound to it's default values (in this case 0).
So to get your desired route, you shouldn't declare route parameters:
[HttpGet]
[Route("")] // <- no route parameters specified
public IActionResult GetByCoordinates([FromQuery]decimal xCoordinate, [FromQuery]decimal yCoordinate)
{
// will be matched by e.g.
// /api/1.0/availabilities?xCoordinate=34.3444&yCoordinate=66.3422
}
Now your desired route will match.
Note: You cannot map two actions to the same route - the route middleware wouldn't know which one to select. So also removing the route parameters from GetByAddress
will effectively map both actions to the same route:
/api/1.0/availabilities?{any=number&of=query¶meters=here}
So you will have to differentiate them by another route segment for example.
[HttpGet]
[Route("address")] // <--
public IActionResult GetByAddress([FromQuery]string city, [FromQuery]string streetName, [FromQuery]int streetNumber, [FromQuery]string littera)
{
// will be matched by e.g.
// api/1.0/availabilities/address?city=Metropolis&streetName=Superstreet&streetNumber=1&littera=A
}
Further reading:
Quick tip:
Set Microsft
loglevel to Debug
in appsettings.json
(auto generated in standard Asp.Net Core WebApplication Template) and you will get very useful information on route selection / errors while route selection in your console output when running under kestrel.
{
"Logging": {
"IncludeScopes": false,
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Debug",
"System": "Information",
"Microsoft": "Debug"
}
Or set up the debug logger in StartUp.cs
to LogLevel.Debug
and you get the same information in debug output directly in Visual Studio.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
// ...
loggerFactory.AddDebug(LogLevel.Debug);
// ...
}
Kasper P
Updated on September 28, 2020Comments
-
Kasper P over 3 years
I'm building a web api where I have one resourse that must have 3 get methods as follows:
[HttpGet] [Route("{city}/{streetName}/{streetNumber}/{littera}")] public IActionResult GetByAddress([FromQuery]string city, [FromQuery]string streetName, [FromQuery]int streetNumber, [FromQuery]string littera) { var model = _availabilityService.FindByAddress(city, streetName, streetNumber, littera); return Ok(model); } [HttpGet("{pointId}")] public IActionResult GetByPointId(string pointId) { var model = _availabilityService.FindByPointId(pointId); return Ok(model); } [HttpGet] [Route("{xCoordinate}/{yCoordinate}")] public IActionResult GetByCoordinates([FromQuery]decimal xCoordinate, [FromQuery]decimal yCoordinate) { var model = _availabilityService.FindByCoordinates(xCoordinate, yCoordinate); return Ok(model); }
The get method with only one parameter(pointId) is working fine since it is not seen as a query string but rather and id. However the remaining 2 methods are not distinguishable by the router in ASP.NET, it seems.
I'm really at a loss here and cannot figure out why it doesn't work. What I have been able to work out is that if I remove one of the methods the other one works fine.
Any suggestions on what I'm doing wrong?
FYI, the corresponding url:s ought to look like the following:
api/1.0/availabilities?city=Metropolis&streetName=Superstreet&streetNumber=1&littera=A
and
/api/1.0/availabilities?xCoordinate=34.3444&yCoordinate=66.3422
Thanks!
-
Kasper P almost 8 yearsThank you for the good explanaition.It does make sense what you are describing. This imposes a new question though, is it a conventional way of doing thins, adding a "routing-word" for a resource to specify its meaning? Thanks for the answer, I've marked it answered! :)
-
ypsilo0n almost 8 years@KasperP In my opinion, do what works best for you when designing an api. That said, especialy as you are asking about convention, REST would be such an convention / paradigm you can (try) to follow. I would probably merge
GetByAddress
andGetByCoordinates
in one search action, as it seems to be just that. REST, URI-Design -
Prophet Lamb over 2 yearsThanks for the answer. Is there any practical way to implement query flags, for a syntax such as
route/session?drop
where the parameter drop specifies that the session should be dropped if any. Or is a unique route required?