How do I open the "front camera" on the Android platform?

169,100

Solution 1

private Camera openFrontFacingCameraGingerbread() {
    int cameraCount = 0;
    Camera cam = null;
    Camera.CameraInfo cameraInfo = new Camera.CameraInfo();
    cameraCount = Camera.getNumberOfCameras();
    for (int camIdx = 0; camIdx < cameraCount; camIdx++) {
        Camera.getCameraInfo(camIdx, cameraInfo);
        if (cameraInfo.facing == Camera.CameraInfo.CAMERA_FACING_FRONT) {
            try {
                cam = Camera.open(camIdx);
            } catch (RuntimeException e) {
                Log.e(TAG, "Camera failed to open: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());
            }
        }
    }

    return cam;
}

Add the following permissions in the AndroidManifest.xml file:

<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.CAMERA" />
<uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.camera" android:required="false" />
<uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.camera.front" android:required="false" />

Note: This feature is available in Gingerbread(2.3) and Up Android Version.

Solution 2

All older answers' methods are deprecated by Google (supposedly because of troubles like this), since API 21 you need to use the Camera 2 API:

This class was deprecated in API level 21. We recommend using the new android.hardware.camera2 API for new applications.

In the newer API you have almost complete power over the Android device camera and documentation explicitly advice to

String[] getCameraIdList()

and then use obtained CameraId to open the camera:

void openCamera(String cameraId, CameraDevice.StateCallback callback, Handler handler)

99% of the frontal cameras have id = "1", and the back camera id = "0" according to this:

Non-removable cameras use integers starting at 0 for their identifiers, while removable cameras have a unique identifier for each individual device, even if they are the same model.

However, this means if device situation is rare like just 1-frontal -camera tablet you need to count how many embedded cameras you have, and place the order of the camera by its importance ("0"). So CAMERA_FACING_FRONT == 1 CAMERA_FACING_BACK == 0, which implies that the back camera is more important than frontal.

I don't know about a uniform method to identify the frontal camera on all Android devices. Simply said, the Android OS inside the device can't really find out which camera is exactly where for some reasons: maybe the only camera hardcoded id is an integer representing its importance or maybe on some devices whichever side you turn will be .. "back".

Documentation: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/camera2/package-summary.html

Explicit Examples: https://github.com/googlesamples/android-Camera2Basic


For the older API (it is not recommended, because it will not work on modern phones newer Android version and transfer is a pain-in-the-arse). Just use the same Integer CameraID (1) to open frontal camera like in this answer:

cam = Camera.open(1);

If you trust OpenCV to do the camera part:

Inside

    <org.opencv.android.JavaCameraView
    ../>

use the following for the frontal camera:

        opencv:camera_id="1"

Solution 3

As of Android 2.1, Android only supports a single camera in its SDK. It is likely that this will be added in a future Android release.

Solution 4

public void surfaceCreated(SurfaceHolder holder) {
    try {
        mCamera = Camera.open();
        mCamera.setDisplayOrientation(90);
        mCamera.setPreviewDisplay(holder);

        Camera.Parameters p = mCamera.getParameters();
        p.set("camera-id",2);
        mCamera.setParameters(p);   
    } catch (IOException e) {
        // TODO Auto-generated catch block
        e.printStackTrace();
    }
}

Solution 5

For API 21 (5.0) and later you can use the CameraManager API's

try {
    String desiredCameraId = null;
    for(String cameraId : mCameraIDsList) {
        CameraCharacteristics chars =  mCameraManager.getCameraCharacteristics(cameraId);
        List<CameraCharacteristics.Key<?>> keys = chars.getKeys();
        try {
            if(CameraCharacteristics.LENS_FACING_FRONT == chars.get(CameraCharacteristics.LENS_FACING)) {
               // This is the one we want.
               desiredCameraId = cameraId;
               break;
            }
        } catch(IllegalArgumentException e) {
            // This key not implemented, which is a bit of a pain. Either guess - assume the first one
            // is rear, second one is front, or give up.
        }
    }
}
Share:
169,100

Related videos on Youtube

Sol
Author by

Sol

Updated on October 27, 2021

Comments

  • Sol
    Sol over 2 years

    More generally, if a device has more than one embedded camera, is there a way to initialize one of them in particular?

    I didn't find it in Android reference documentation:

    Samsung SHW-M100S has two cameras. If there is no reference to use two cameras, any idea how Samsung did...?

  • Mahesh
    Mahesh over 13 years
    Good working on Galaxy S Important "camera-id" not "camera_id"
  • ozmank
    ozmank about 12 years
    this statment is valid for Android 2.2 aswell?
  • CommonsWare
    CommonsWare about 12 years
    @ozmank: Yes, multiple-camera support was not added until Android 2.3.
  • loeschg
    loeschg almost 11 years
    Is it possible to use this somehow with the Intent intent = new Intent(MediaStore.ACTION_IMAGE_CAPTURE); technique to open the existing camera app?
  • Admin
    Admin almost 11 years
    @loeschg Intent handles camera action in its own way. This technique is used when you are using SurfaceView to exploit camera functionality.
  • loeschg
    loeschg almost 11 years
    that's what I figured. Thanks!
  • X.Y.
    X.Y. over 10 years
    I don't think it's documented usage. open(int id) accepts the id, not camera position
  • Matthias
    Matthias about 10 years
    Very cool post. Took me a while to figure out that camera facing is not neccessarily the same than the camera index. For example my tablet has only one camera (index: 0) but facing front (facing index: 1). Therefore using the simple code like Camera.open(CameraInfo.CAMERA_FACING_FRONT) is nonesense.
  • Admin
    Admin about 10 years
    @Matthias Agree with you mate. As we have different OEMs, our programming technique gets changed as per our needs. Thanks for highlighting.
  • Alex Cohn
    Alex Cohn about 10 years
    please remove this misleading answer
  • Amalan Dhananjayan
    Amalan Dhananjayan about 10 years
    @AlexCohn Can you please explain why this answer should be removed. It seems like many of them are fine with the answer.
  • Alex Cohn
    Alex Cohn about 10 years
    @AmalanDhananjayan: see for example the comment by @Matthias above: …Took me a while to figure out that camera facing is not neccessarily the same than the camera index. For example my tablet has only one camera (index: 0) but facing front (facing index: 1). Therefore using the simple code like Camera.open(CameraInfo.CAMERA_FACING_FRONT) is nonesense.
  • Adam
    Adam about 9 years
    This is balderdash. Don't even attempt to use this.
  • colintheshots
    colintheshots about 8 years
    This is horrific. Do not EVER do this. This answer should be banned. Camera.open() accepts a camera id, not the ordinal value of the camera facing! This fails across a significant minority of devices and only works through sheer dumb luck.
  • colintheshots
    colintheshots about 8 years
    Never assume 90 degrees will get you the correct rotation for portrait. It's different on many devices.
  • Clive
    Clive almost 7 years
    @AlexCohn Please stop defacing this answer and adding your flair to it. The objections in the comments are sufficient, posts shouldn't be edited to add meta information
  • Alex Cohn
    Alex Cohn almost 7 years
    @Clive: this approach was supported by Community: meta.stackoverflow.com/a/311430/192373
  • Clive
    Clive almost 7 years
    I don't believe that's policy, just a somewhat popular opinion on that day. Flagged for mod to make the decision, easier that way @AlexCohn. If you want to rollback my rollback in lieu of that please do
  • Alex Cohn
    Alex Cohn almost 7 years
    @Clive, my experience getting mod attention has never been very successful. I will be glad if it works now.
  • Alex Cohn
    Alex Cohn almost 7 years
    @Clive, thanks, we did get mod attention. Was it helpful?
  • civani mahida
    civani mahida over 4 years
    not working with pie or oreo updated version of android
  • Ankit Gupta
    Ankit Gupta over 3 years
    Did you get any solution to this for API 28 and above?