How to make CSS Grid items take up remaining space?

73,663

Solution 1

Adding grid-template-rows: 1fr min-content; to your .grid will get you exactly what you're after :).

.grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 1fr 3fr;
  grid-template-rows: 1fr min-content;
  grid-template-areas:
    "one two"
    "one three"
}

.one {
  background: red;
  grid-area: one;
  padding: 50px 0;
}

.two {
  background: green;
  grid-area: two;
}

.three {
  background: blue;
  grid-area: three;
}
<div class="grid">
  <div class="one">
    One
  </div>
  <div class="two">
    Two
  </div>
  <div class="three">
    Three
  </div>
</div>

Jens edits: For better browser support this can be used instead: grid-template-rows: 1fr auto;, at least in this exact case.

Solution 2

A grid is a series of intersecting rows and columns.

You want the two items in the second column to automatically adjust their row height based on their content height.

That's not how a grid works. Such changes to the row height in the second column would also affect the first column.

If you must use CSS Grid, then what I would do is give the container, let's say, 12 rows, then have items span rows as necessary.

.grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 1fr 3fr;
  grid-template-rows: repeat(12, 15px);
}

.one {
  grid-row: 1 / -1;
  background: red;
}

.two {
  grid-row: span 10;
  background: lightgreen;
}

.three {
  grid-row: span 2;
  background: aqua;
}

.grid > div {
  display: flex;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
}
<div class="grid">
  <div class="one">One</div>
  <div class="two">Two</div>
  <div class="three">Three</div>
</div>

Otherwise, you can try a flexbox solution.

.grid {
  display: flex;
  flex-flow: column wrap;
  height: 200px;
}

.one {
  flex: 0 0 100%;
  width: 30%;
  background: red;
}

.two {
  flex: 1 0 1px;
  width: 70%;
  background: lightgreen;
}

.three {
  background: aqua;
}

.grid>div {
  display: flex;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
}
<div class="grid">
  <div class="one">One</div>
  <div class="two">Two</div>
  <div class="three">Three</div>
</div>

Solution 3

When using grid, and you have grid template area used, and by chance you gave a particular area a width, you are left with a space grid does automatically. In this situation, let grid-template-columns be either min-content or max-content, so that it adjusts its position automatically.

Solution 4

A possible approach might be grouping two and three together, and using flexbox:

.grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 1fr 3fr;
  grid-template-areas: "one two"
}

.one {
  background: red;
  grid-area: one;
  padding: 50px 0;
}

.wrap {
  grid-area: two;
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: column;
}

.two {
  background: green;
  flex: 1;
}

.three {
  background: blue;
}
<div class="grid">
  <div class="one">
    One
  </div>
  <div class="wrap">

    <div class="two">
      Two
    </div>
    <div class="three">
      Three
    </div>
  </div>
</div>

Share:
73,663
Jens Törnell
Author by

Jens Törnell

Updated on July 09, 2022

Comments

  • Jens Törnell
    Jens Törnell almost 2 years

    I have a card built with CSS Grid layout. There might be an image to the left, some text to the right top and maybe a button or a link at the right bottom.

    In the code below, how can I make the green area take up as much space as possible and at the same time make the blue area take up as little space as possible?

    The green should push the blue area down as far as possible.

    https://jsfiddle.net/9nxpvs5m/

    .grid {
      display: grid;
      grid-template-columns: 1fr 3fr;
      grid-template-areas:
        "one two"
        "one three"
    }
    
    .one {
      background: red;
      grid-area: one;
      padding: 50px 0;
    }
    
    .two {
      background: green;
      grid-area: two;
    }
    
    .three {
      background: blue;
      grid-area: three;
    }
    <div class="grid">
      <div class="one">
        One
      </div>
      <div class="two">
        Two
      </div>
      <div class="three">
        Three
      </div>
    </div>
  • domsson
    domsson almost 7 years
    Exactly my line of thought. Flexbox is really my go-to solution these days. However, it is a pitty flexbox isn't actually flexible enough to get this simple layout going without an additional container around .two and .three - or is there a way?
  • sol
    sol almost 7 years
    @domsson Not that I can think of :)
  • Jens Törnell
    Jens Törnell almost 7 years
    I think this is a workaround so I'll wait a while before accepting this as an answer. A grid only solution if exists will be accepted as an answer.
  • Michael Benjamin
    Michael Benjamin almost 7 years
    I had considered the min-content approach, but that value has weak browser support. It didn't work in Safari and Firefox when I tested it.
  • scottperezfox
    scottperezfox almost 3 years
    I had a similar problem with a single-column, four-row grid. Used grid-template-rows: auto auto auto 1fr; and it now expands the final row to fill the remainder of the page. This is my goal — thanks for the tip.