How to pass a list as an input of a function in Python

64,959

Solution 1

You are currently returning a value from your function in the first iteration of your for loop. Because of this, the second and third iteration of your for loop never take place. You need to move your return statement outside of the loop as follows:

import math

def square(x):
    result = []
    for y in x:
        result.append(math.pow(y,2.0))
    return result 

print(square([1,2,3]))

Output

[1.0, 4.0, 9.0]

Solution 2

Why not side-step the problem altogether?

def square(vals):
    return [v*v for v in vals]

Edit: The first problem, as several people have pointed out, is that you are short-circuiting your for loop. Your return should come after the loop, not in it.

The next problem is your use of list.append - you need to call it, not assign to it, ie result.append(y*y). result.append = y*y instead overwrites the method with a numeric value, probably throwing an error the next time you try to call it.

Once you fix that, you will find another less obvious error occurs if you call your function repeatedly:

print(square([1,2,3])     # => [1, 4, 9]
print(square([1,2,3])     # => [1, 4, 9, 1, 4, 9]

Because you pass a mutable item (a list) as a default, all further use of that default item points back to the same original list.

Instead, try

def square(vals, result=None):
    if result is None:
        result = []
    result.extend(v*v for v in vals)
    return result

Solution 3

We even use result? You can use a list comprehension to generate your result which you then return. I'm not sure why you passed result as a variable into the function, since it is not used.

Also, having return result inside your loop means the function returns the value on the first iteration, so it just returns the square of the first number in the list.

import math

def square(x):
    return [math.pow(y, 2) for y in x]

>>> print(square([1,2,3]))
[1.0, 4.0, 9.0]

Solution 4

You might be interested in using yield

def square(x):
    for y in x:
        yield math.pow(y, 2.0)

that way you can either call

for sq in square(x):
    ...

which won't generate the entire list of squares at once but rather one element per iteration, or use list(square(x)) to obtain the full list on demand.

Solution 5

You should return outside the for loop. Otherwise, it will stop after first iteration.

def square(x):
    result=[]
    for y in x:
        result.append(math.pow(y,2.0)) # add to list after calculation
    return result 

print(square([1,2,3])
Share:
64,959
Arpan Das
Author by

Arpan Das

Updated on December 01, 2020

Comments

  • Arpan Das
    Arpan Das over 3 years

    I am using Python, and I have a function which takes a list as the argument. For example, I am using the following syntax,

    def square(x,result= []):
        for y in x:
            result.append=math.pow(y,2.0)
            return result
    
    print(square([1,2,3]))
    

    and the output is [1] only where I am supposed to get [1,4,9].

    What am I doing wrong?

  • ShaneQful
    ShaneQful over 8 years
    This doesn't really tell the OP where they are going wrong and is just a one liner of how to square an array
  • BasedRebel
    BasedRebel over 8 years
    @ShaneQful: please take another look.
  • muru
    muru over 8 years
    Well, it could be seen as the initial value, for example. Perhaps OP intended square([1,2,3],[100,200,300]) to return [100,200,300,1,4,9].
  • Pharap
    Pharap over 8 years
    As someone used to brace based programming rather than indentation based, I must say that single tab changing where the function returns from is something I find horribly unintuitive.
  • Matthias
    Matthias over 8 years
    But you still indent your code even if your using braces, don't you?
  • Cees Timmerman
    Cees Timmerman over 8 years
    Append is a function you don't want to overwrite here.
  • ShaneQful
    ShaneQful about 8 years
    Apologies, my initial comment above was based on your initial succinct answer. Have an up vote :)
  • Christoph Rackwitz
    Christoph Rackwitz about 2 years
    this is the only answer that even mentions the mistaken assignment to result.append, which is an error in all situations.