How to test if an executable exists in the %PATH% from a windows batch file?

61,665

Solution 1

for %%X in (myExecutable.exe) do (set FOUND=%%~$PATH:X)
if defined FOUND ...

If you need this for different extensions, just iterate over PATHEXT:

set FOUND=
for %%e in (%PATHEXT%) do (
  for %%X in (myExecutable%%e) do (
    if not defined FOUND (
      set FOUND=%%~$PATH:X
    )
  )
)

Could be that where also exists already on legacy Windows versions, but I don't have access to one, so I cannot tell. On my machine the following also works:

where myExecutable

and returns with a non-zero exit code if it couldn't be found. In a batch you probably also want to redirect output to NUL, though.

Keep in mind

Parsing in batch (.bat) files and on the command line differs (because batch files have %0%9), so you have to double the % there. On the command line this isn't necessary, so for variables are just %X.

Solution 2

Windows Vista and later versions ship with a program called where.exe that searches for programs in the path. It works like this:

D:\>where notepad
C:\Windows\System32\notepad.exe
C:\Windows\notepad.exe

D:\>where where
C:\Windows\System32\where.exe

For use in a batch file you can use the /q switch, which just sets ERRORLEVEL and doesn't produce any output.

where /q myapplication
IF ERRORLEVEL 1 (
    ECHO The application is missing. Ensure it is installed and placed in your PATH.
    EXIT /B
) ELSE (
    ECHO Application exists. Let's go!
)

Or a simple (but less readable) shorthand version that prints the message and exits your app:

where /q myapplication || ECHO Cound not find app. && EXIT /B

Solution 3

Here is a simple solution that attempts to run the application and handles any error afterwards.

file.exe /?  2> NUL
IF NOT %ERRORLEVEL%==9009 ECHO file.exe exists in path

Error code 9009 usually means file not found.

The only downside is that file.exe is actually executed if found (which in some cases is not desiderable).

Solution 4

This can be accomplished via parameter substitution.

%~$PATH:1

This returns the full path of the executable filename in %1, else an empty string.

This does not work with user-defined variables. So if the executable filename is not a parameter to your script, then you need a subroutine. For example:

call :s_which app.exe
if not "%_path%" == "" (
  "%_path%"
)

goto :eof

:s_which
  setlocal
  endlocal & set _path=%~$PATH:1
  goto :eof

See http://ss64.com/nt/syntax-args.html

Solution 5

For those looking for a PowerShell option. You can use the Get-Command cmdlet passing two items. First give the current dir location with .\ prefixed, then give just the exe name.

(Get-Command ".\notepad", "notepad" -ErrorAction Ignore -CommandType Application) -ne $null

That will return true if found local or in system wide paths.

Share:
61,665
sorin
Author by

sorin

Another geek still trying to decipher the meaning of “42”. It seems that amount his main interest are: online communities of practice and the way they evolve in time product design, simplicity in design and accessibility productivity and the way the IT solutions are impacting it

Updated on March 25, 2020

Comments

  • sorin
    sorin about 4 years

    I'm looking for a simple way to test if an executable exists in the PATH environment variable from a Windows batch file.

    Usage of external tools not provided by the OS is not allowed. The minimal Windows version required is Windows XP.

  • Rich
    Rich over 13 years
    Won't work as for is not smart enough to parse the contents of PATH. It will miss directories with spaces, for example. And even when you use for /f with delims=; it will not work correctly if a directory contains a ; and is quoted.
  • sorin
    sorin over 13 years
    I like your approach but it would be even better if you could provide the full version, the one that does also use PATHEXT for this.
  • Ryan Bemrose
    Ryan Bemrose almost 13 years
    For XP you need the loop script (or download where.exe from the RK). Vista and 7 ships with where.exe. I know the OP specifically said XP, but for posterity the best answer is always to use where myExecutable.
  • Rich
    Rich almost 13 years
    Ryan: Huh? I don't think I can parse your sentence.
  • too
    too over 12 years
    where.exe (shipped only with Vista and up) has a /q switch which suppresses the need of redirecting output in a script. where /q cmd OR where /q cmd.exe does do the trick.
  • simgineer
    simgineer over 12 years
    i'm a batch scripting beginner and am not sure what the %%x means. On my Windows 7 system i tried typing: for %%X in (myExecutable.exe) do (set FOUND=%%~$PATH:X) and then hit returned. i got this in response: C:\Users\James>for %%X in (cmd.exe) do (set FOUND=%%~$PATH:X) %%X was unexpected at this time.
  • Rich
    Rich over 12 years
    simengineer: Parsing in batch files and on the command line differs (because batch files have %0%9), so you have to double the % there. On the command line this isn't necessary, so for variables are just %x.
  • XP1
    XP1 about 12 years
    @Joey, how about string replacement? Replace ; with "; ": set quotedPath="%PATH:;="; "%".
  • Rich
    Rich about 12 years
    XP1: Nope, still useless. Try it by appending "C:\Folder with; semicolon, quoted" to the path and see what happens. At least here it tries treating every »word« separately which, in a way, is worse than the behaviour before.
  • Palax
    Palax about 11 years
    great! this works after hours of investigations on this issue
  • Beachwalker
    Beachwalker over 10 years
    But what if the system environment uses an other language?
  • eadmaster
    eadmaster over 10 years
    the only downside is that "file.exe" is executed (which in some cases is unwanted)
  • Sk8erPeter
    Sk8erPeter about 10 years
    @RyanBemrose: I think you should post it as a separate answer, even if the OP asked for XP. :) (I think many of us will still find this thread who don't use XP anymore - and it's good that we don't use it anymore.) It's a really good idea (I firstly forgot where opportunity), and you would get upvotes - at least from me. :)
  • Ronald Zarīts
    Ronald Zarīts over 8 years
    This won't work. Test-Path only checks the specified path, i.e. Test-Path nuget.exe will return true only if nuget.exe is in the current directory. If nuget.exe is not in the current directory, it will return false, even if it is in a directory listed in the PATH variable. In PowerShell Get-Command might work better(stackoverflow.com/questions/11242368/…), but take into account that for PowerShell the current directory is not in the path.
  • Pawel Cioch
    Pawel Cioch over 7 years
    Very nice and simple! Thanks!
  • gavenkoa
    gavenkoa over 7 years
    Interesting trick with setlocal but for %%X in (myExecutable.exe) do (set FOUND=%%~$PATH:X) is one line solution with for used as workaround for %%~$PATH:X in order to avoid call and %~$PATH:1.
  • John C
    John C over 5 years
    As @RonaldZarits pointed out, for full PowerShell support, you can use the Get-Command with two options. First give the current dir location, then give just the exe name. (Get-Command ".\notepad", "notepad" -ErrorAction Ignore -CommandType Application) -ne $null will return true if found local or in path.
  • John C
    John C over 3 years
    Nothing better than downvote and run users. If you disagree and are going to go as far as downvoting, then also add a comment to give your reason why you disagree that this is not a good approach at getting the desired results.