How to test internal class library?

33,484

Solution 1

In .NET, you can use the InternalsVisibleToAttribute in your class library to make your internal types visible to your unit test project.

That way, you can keep your class internal and still use it from other assemblies that you give access.

You use it like this:

[assembly:InternalsVisibleTo("NameOfYourUnitTestProject")]

Solution 2

For the latest csproj 2017 formated projects, if your project does not have the AssemblyInfo.cs file, you can add the following setting:

  <ItemGroup>
    <AssemblyAttribute Include="System.Runtime.CompilerServices.InternalsVisibleTo">
      <_Parameter1>$(MSBuildProjectName).Tests</_Parameter1>
    </AssemblyAttribute>
  </ItemGroup>

You also can use other variables to relplace MSBuildProjectName such as AssemblyName or use the unittest project name directly.

You can check the ProjectName.AssemblyInfo.cs in obj folder (obj\Debug\netstandard2.0) has been updated by adding InternalsVisibleTo.

Share:
33,484
Thomas Mondel
Author by

Thomas Mondel

Updated on July 05, 2022

Comments

  • Thomas Mondel
    Thomas Mondel almost 2 years

    I would like to write a class library which creates for me a complex object but should only be exposed as little as possible. I want it to be included into other projects and there I only have one call to this library which e.g. returns me an object of a internally created class. I don't want to allow others to create these objects explicitly, but still I want to create a test project for this class library.

    For example:

    var result = Manager.Instance.Create(definition)
    

    This should be the only access to the class library.

    Based on the definition parameter it uses different sub classes to create the requested instance and sets its properties accordingly. Therefore I want to assure somehow by tests that the whole creation process worked fine. But since I also don't want to expose very little internal properties of the result object too I cannot test by only using this public access method since I don't have any properties to assert on.

    I know that you should not test for internal mechanics and it is typically bad design and I also was reading through this article, but isn't there maybe any way to create a library plus unit test project and maybe afterwards limit the access to this class? with a wrapper or something?

  • Vincent Sels
    Vincent Sels about 10 years
    Great solution! Some extra info: 1) In case this [assembly: ...] syntax doesn't ring a bell: these are Assembly Attributes ( msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/4w8c1y2s.aspx ), the most well-known of which are the AssemblyVersionAttribute and its brothers. 2) You can use these in any .cs file in your project, outside a namespace, but typically, they are specified in the AssemblyInfo file located in the 'Properties' project folder. 3) You must indeed specify the name of your project, not the namespace, in case these differ.
  • MaYaN
    MaYaN over 8 years
    That's awesome, I had no idea one could do this, you learn something new every day!
  • Zeliax
    Zeliax over 6 years
    Thanks. The name for the test project was all I was missing. I found a lot of examples not explaining what string to put into the assembly command. Inputting the name of my test project did the trick!