Mapping Database Views to EF 5.0 Code First w/Migrations

14,121

Solution 1

You have specified that the ClientStatisticsView entity should be mapped to a table named "ClientStatistics". So entity framework will generate a migration containing an instruction to create that table. But you have independently created that view in the database so to prevent the error you are getting you should remove the CreateTable instruction from the Up migration.

I think a better way to do it is to create the view in the migration by running sql like this:

public override void Up()
{
    Sql("EXEC ('CREATE View [dbo].[ClientStatistics] AS --etc"
}

public override void Down()
{

    Sql(@"IF  EXISTS (SELECT
                        *
                    FROM sys.views
                    WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.ClientStatistics'))
                    DROP VIEW dbo.ClientStatistics)")
}

That way your views and tables are specified in one place and you can safely migrate up and down

Reference

http://elegantcode.com/2012/04/12/entity-framework-migrations-tips/

Solution 2

I'm actually working with Entity Framework "Code First" and views, the way I do it is like this:

1) Create a class

[Table("view_name_on_database")]
public class ViewClassName {
    // View columns mapping
    public int Id {get; set;}
    public string Name {get; set;}
    // And a few more...
}

2) Add the class to the context

public class ContextName : DbContext {

    // Tables
    public DbSet<SomeTableClassHere> ATable { get; set; }
    // And other tables...

    // Views
    public DbSet<ViewClassName> ViewContextName { get; set; }

    // This lines help me during "update-database" command
    protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder) {
        // Remove comments before "update-database" command and 
        // comment this line again after "update-database", otherwise 
        // you will not be able to query the view from the context.
        // Ignore the creation of a table named "view_name_on_database"
        modelBuilder.Ignore<ViewClassName>();
    }
}

A little bit late but I hope this helps somebody.

If there was a way to ignore the creation of a table named as the view during "update-database" and not-ignore after this that would be great.

Share:
14,121
Corey Adler
Author by

Corey Adler

Software developer with over 11 years of experience. Versatile programmer who has worked on diverse projects ranging from enterprise SaaS software to corporate websites. Experienced in leading teams of developers to deliver quality products to customers. Ability to code for both Web and Windows applications in either a front-end or back-end capacity. Hard working and reliable engineer who will go beyond his job description to help the company attain greater heights.

Updated on July 18, 2022

Comments

  • Corey Adler
    Corey Adler almost 2 years

    I'm trying to map a SQL View to an entity in EF 5.0 Code First w/Migrations for displaying some basic information on a page without having to query multiple tables for that information (which currently takes ~20 seconds to load. NOT GOOD.). I've heard that it is possible to do, but I haven't been able to figure out or find online a way to properly do so.

    EDIT: For a more in-depth look at my solution to this problem, read this blog post on the subject.

    Here is my View:

    CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ClientStatistics]
    AS
    SELECT       ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order By c.ID) as Row, c.LegacyID, c.ID, c.ClientName, slc.AccountManager, slc.Network,
                                 (SELECT        MAX(CreatedDate) AS Expr1
                                   FROM            dbo.DataPeriods
                                   WHERE        (ClientID = c.ID)) AS LastDataReceived,
                                 (SELECT        MAX(ApprovedDate) AS Expr1
                                   FROM            dbo.DataPeriods AS DataPeriods_2
                                   WHERE        (ClientID = c.ID)) AS LastApproved,
                                 (SELECT        MAX(ReportProcessedDate) AS Expr1
                                   FROM            dbo.DataPeriods AS DataPeriods_1
                                   WHERE        (ClientID = c.ID)) AS LastReportProcesssed
    FROM            dbo.Clients AS c INNER JOIN
                             dbo.SLClients AS slc ON c.ID = slc.ClientID
    

    Here is the entity:

    public class ClientStatisticsView
    {
        [Key]
        public int Row { get; set; }
        public int LegacyID { get; set; }
        public int ClientID { get; set; }
        public string ClientName { get; set; }
        public string AccountManager { get; set; }
        public string Network { get; set; }
        public DateTime LastDataReceived { get; set; }
        public DateTime LastApproved { get; set; }
        public DateTime LastReportProcessed { get; set; }
    }
    

    And finally my mapping in DbContext:

    protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<OneToManyCascadeDeleteConvention>();
    
        modelBuilder.Entity<ClientStatisticsView>().ToTable("ClientStatistics");
    
        base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
    }
    

    All of this gives me the following error:

    There is already an object named 'ClientStatistics' in the database.

    What am I doing wrong? Is there any way to me to accomplish this, or should I be doing something else instead?

  • Corey Adler
    Corey Adler over 10 years
    I just want to add, for anyone seeing this answer, that you will need to use the add-migration command at the beginning in order for it to map properly.
  • spender
    spender almost 7 years
    If you're fastidious about making all schema changes via migrations, then the IF EXISTS clause of the Down method is not required.
  • Jonathan Stark
    Jonathan Stark almost 7 years
    @spender that is true. I use the default scripting from Sql Server, which puts in the IF EXISTS clause automatically. I don't feel the need to remove it
  • Vincent
    Vincent almost 7 years
    That's the only I found to resolve the migration with views issue, there is another missing bit in your code. When you remove comments/comment the ignore line, EF will throw the exception, I add the following line before the ignore to get it working finally. Database.SetInitializer<RegulatoryPortalDataContext>(null);