print a __m128i variable

29,895

Solution 1

Use this function to print them:

#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>

void print128_num(__m128i var)
{
    uint16_t val[8];
    memcpy(val, &var, sizeof(val));
    printf("Numerical: %i %i %i %i %i %i %i %i \n", 
           val[0], val[1], val[2], val[3], val[4], val[5], 
           val[6], val[7]);
}

You split 128bits into 16-bits(or 32-bits) before printing them.

This is a way of 64-bit splitting and printing if you have 64-bit support available:

#include <inttypes.h>

void print128_num(__m128i var) 
{
    int64_t v64val[2];
    memcpy(v64val, &var, sizeof(v64val));
    printf("%.16llx %.16llx\n", v64val[1], v64val[0]);
}

Note: casting the &var directly to an int* or uint16_t* would also work MSVC, but this violates strict aliasing and is undefined behaviour. Using memcpy is the standard compliant way to do the same and with minimal optimization the compiler will generate the exact same binary code.

Solution 2

  • Portable across gcc/clang/ICC/MSVC, C and C++.
  • fully safe with all optimization levels: no strict-aliasing violation UB
  • print in hex as u8, u16, u32, or u64 elements (based on @AG1's answer)
  • Prints in memory order (least-significant element first, like _mm_setr_epiX). Reverse the array indices if you prefer printing in the same order Intel's manuals use, where the most significant element is on the left (like _mm_set_epiX). Related: Convention for displaying vector registers

Using a __m128i* to load from an array of int is safe because the __m128 types are defined to allow aliasing just like ISO C unsigned char*. (e.g. in gcc's headers, the definition includes __attribute__((may_alias)).)

The reverse isn't safe (pointing an int* onto part of a __m128i object). MSVC guarantees that's safe, but GCC/clang don't. (-fstrict-aliasing is on by default). It sometimes works with GCC/clang, but why risk it? It sometimes even interferes with optimization; see this Q&A. See also Is `reinterpret_cast`ing between hardware SIMD vector pointer and the corresponding type an undefined behavior?

(uint32_t*) &my_vector violates the C and C++ aliasing rules, and is not guaranteed to work the way you'd expect. Storing to a local array and then accessing it is guaranteed to be safe. It even optimizes away with most compilers, so you get movq / pextrq directly from xmm to integer registers instead of an actual store/reload, for example.

Source + asm output on the Godbolt compiler explorer: proof it compiles with MSVC and so on.

#include <immintrin.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>

#ifndef __cplusplus
#include <stdalign.h>   // C11 defines _Alignas().  This header defines alignas()
#endif

void p128_hex_u8(__m128i in) {
    alignas(16) uint8_t v[16];
    _mm_store_si128((__m128i*)v, in);
    printf("v16_u8: %x %x %x %x | %x %x %x %x | %x %x %x %x | %x %x %x %x\n",
           v[0], v[1],  v[2],  v[3],  v[4],  v[5],  v[6],  v[7],
           v[8], v[9], v[10], v[11], v[12], v[13], v[14], v[15]);
}

void p128_hex_u16(__m128i in) {
    alignas(16) uint16_t v[8];
    _mm_store_si128((__m128i*)v, in);
    printf("v8_u16: %x %x %x %x,  %x %x %x %x\n", v[0], v[1], v[2], v[3], v[4], v[5], v[6], v[7]);
}

void p128_hex_u32(__m128i in) {
    alignas(16) uint32_t v[4];
    _mm_store_si128((__m128i*)v, in);
    printf("v4_u32: %x %x %x %x\n", v[0], v[1], v[2], v[3]);
}

void p128_hex_u64(__m128i in) {
    alignas(16) unsigned long long v[2];  // uint64_t might give format-string warnings with %llx; it's just long in some ABIs
    _mm_store_si128((__m128i*)v, in);
    printf("v2_u64: %llx %llx\n", v[0], v[1]);
}

If you need portability to C99 or C++03 or earlier (i.e. without C11 / C++11), remove the alignas() and use storeu instead of store. Or use __attribute__((aligned(16))) or __declspec( align(16) ) instead.

(If you're writing code with intrinsics, you should be using a recent compiler version. Newer compilers usually make better asm than older compilers, including for SSE/AVX intrinsics. But maybe you want to use gcc-6.3 with -std=gnu++03 C++03 mode for a codebase that isn't ready for C++11 or something.)


Sample output from calling all 4 functions on

// source used:
__m128i vec = _mm_setr_epi8(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
                            8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16);

// output:

v2_u64: 0x807060504030201 0x100f0e0d0c0b0a09
v4_u32: 0x4030201 0x8070605 0xc0b0a09 0x100f0e0d
v8_u16: 0x201 0x403 0x605 0x807  | 0xa09 0xc0b 0xe0d 0x100f
v16_u8: 0x1 0x2 0x3 0x4 | 0x5 0x6 0x7 0x8 | 0x9 0xa 0xb 0xc | 0xd 0xe 0xf 0x10

Adjust the format strings if you want to pad with leading zeros for consistent output width. See printf(3).

Solution 3

I know this question is tagged C, but it was the best search result also when looking for a C++ solution to the same problem.

So, this could be a C++ implementation:

#include <string>
#include <cstring>
#include <sstream>

#if defined(__SSE2__)
template <typename T>
std::string __m128i_toString(const __m128i var) {
    std::stringstream sstr;
    T values[16/sizeof(T)];
    std::memcpy(values,&var,sizeof(values)); //See discussion below
    if (sizeof(T) == 1) {
        for (unsigned int i = 0; i < sizeof(__m128i); i++) { //C++11: Range for also possible
            sstr << (int) values[i] << " ";
        }
    } else {
        for (unsigned int i = 0; i < sizeof(__m128i) / sizeof(T); i++) { //C++11: Range for also possible
            sstr << values[i] << " ";
        }
    }
    return sstr.str();
}
#endif

Usage:

#include <iostream>
[..]
__m128i x
[..]
std::cout << __m128i_toString<uint8_t>(x) << std::endl;
std::cout << __m128i_toString<uint16_t>(x) << std::endl;
std::cout << __m128i_toString<uint32_t>(x) << std::endl;
std::cout << __m128i_toString<uint64_t>(x) << std::endl;

Result:

141 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 104 0 0 0 0 0 0
29325 0 0 0 26775 0 0 0
29325 0 26775 0
29325 26775

Note: there exists a simple way to avoid the if (size(T)==1), see https://stackoverflow.com/a/28414758/2436175

Solution 4

#include<stdio.h>
#include<emmintrin.h>
int main()
{
    __m128i a = _mm_set_epi32(1,2,3,4);
    __m128i b = _mm_set_epi32(1,2,3,4);
    __m128i c;

    const int32_t* q; 
    //add a pointer 
    c = _mm_add_epi32(a,b);

    q = (const int32_t*) &c;
    printf("%d\n",q[2]);
    //printf("%d\n",c[2]);
    return 0;
}

Try this code.

Share:
29,895
arunmoezhi
Author by

arunmoezhi

i consider myself jack of all trades and master of none https://github.com/arunmoezhi SOreadytohelp

Updated on August 12, 2020

Comments

  • arunmoezhi
    arunmoezhi over 3 years

    I'm trying to learn to code using intrinsics and below is a code which does addition

    compiler used: icc

    #include<stdio.h>
    #include<emmintrin.h>
    int main()
    {
            __m128i a = _mm_set_epi32(1,2,3,4);
            __m128i b = _mm_set_epi32(1,2,3,4);
            __m128i c;
            c = _mm_add_epi32(a,b);
            printf("%d\n",c[2]);
            return 0;
    }
    

    I get the below error:

    test.c(9): error: expression must have pointer-to-object type
            printf("%d\n",c[2]);
    

    How do I print the values in the variable c which is of type __m128i