PropertyDefinition inconsistent
Solution 1
The issue is that the Resources.Properties.AttributeDefinitions
key must only define columns used for indexes or keys. In other words, the keys in Resources.Properties.AttributeDefinitions
must match the same keys defined in Resources.Properties.KeySchema
.
AWS docs:
AttributeDefinitions: A list of AttributeName and AttributeType objects that describe the key schema for the table and indexes.
so the resulting template would look like this:
{
"AWSTemplateFormatVersion" : "2010-09-09",
"Description" : "DB Description",
"Resources" : {
"TableName" : {
"Type" : "AWS::DynamoDB::Table",
"Properties" : {
"AttributeDefinitions": [ {
"AttributeName" : "ID",
"AttributeType" : "S"
} ],
"ProvisionedThroughput":{
"ReadCapacityUnits" : 1,
"WriteCapacityUnits" : 1
},
"KeySchema": [
{
"AttributeName": "ID",
"KeyType": "HASH"
}
] ,
"TableName": "table5"
}
}
}
}
Solution 2
The accepted answer is correct in the cause of the error, but you said you wanted the sort key to be Value
. So you should change your CloudFormation to include that:
{
"AWSTemplateFormatVersion" : "2010-09-09",
"Description" : "DB Description",
"Resources" : {
"TableName" : {
"Type" : "AWS::DynamoDB::Table",
"Properties" : {
"AttributeDefinitions": [ {
"AttributeName" : "ID",
"AttributeType" : "S"
}, {
"AttributeName" : "Value",
"AttributeType" : "S"
} ],
"KeySchema": [
{
"AttributeName": "ID",
"KeyType": "HASH"
},
{
"AttributeName": "Value",
"KeyType": "RANGE"
}
]
},
"TableName": "TableName"
}
}
}
Em Ae
Updated on February 13, 2020Comments
-
Em Ae about 4 years
I have following template that i am using in cloudformation UI to create dynamoDB table. I want to create a table with PrimaryKey as ID and sortKey as Value
{ "AWSTemplateFormatVersion" : "2010-09-09", "Description" : "DB Description", "Resources" : { "TableName" : { "Type" : "AWS::DynamoDB::Table", "Properties" : { "AttributeDefinitions": [ { "AttributeName" : "ID", "AttributeType" : "S" }, { "AttributeName" : "Value", "AttributeType" : "S" } ], "KeySchema": [ { "AttributeName": "ID", "KeyType": "HASH" } ] }, "TableName": "TableName" } } }
On the CF UI, I click on new stack, point to the
template
file from my local computer, give stack a name and click next. After sometime, I get error that says Property AttributeDefinitions is inconsistent with the KeySchema of the table and the secondary indexes -
Dilantha over 6 yearsIf we remove the 'value' attribute from AttributeDefinitions how can we add the 'Value' column to the table ?
-
ThomasP1988 over 6 yearsstackoverflow.com/questions/25606135/… After a research, there is no need to define all your columns when you create the table, only indexes, then you can add attributes "on the go" when inserting a new row
-
ThomasP1988 over 6 yearsstackoverflow.com/questions/47385177/… another answer which explains that
-
Jason Wadsworth about 4 yearsThe question stated that
Value
should be the sort key, so it should be included in theKeySchema
, not removed from theAttributeDefinitions
.