python process takes 100% CPU
Solution 1
If you know when the next run will be, you can simply use time.sleep
:
import time
interval = 5
next_run = 0
while True:
time.sleep(max(0, next_run - time.time()))
next_run = time.time() + interval
action_print()
If you want other threads to be able to interrupt you, use an event like this:
import time,threading
interval = 5
next_run = 0
interruptEvent = threading.Event()
while True:
interruptEvent.wait(max(0, next_run - time.time()))
interruptEvent.clear()
next_run = time.time() + interval
action_print()
Another thread can now call interruptEvent.set()
to wake up yours.
In many cases, you will also want to use a Lock to avoid race conditions on shared data. Make sure to clear the event while you hold the lock.
You should also be aware that under cpython, only one thread can execute Python code. Therefore, if your program is CPU-bound over multiple threads and you're using cpython or pypy, you should substitute threading
with multiprocessing
.
Solution 2
Presumably you do not want to write time.sleep(interval) , but replacing 'pass' with time.sleep(0.1) will almost completely free up your CPU, and still allow you flexibility in the WHILE predicate.
Alternatively you could use a thread for each event you are scheduling and use time.sleep(interval) but this will still tie up your CPU.
Bottom line : your loop WHILE : PASS is going round and round very fast consuming all your CPU.
m1k3y3
The Seeker, a programming enthusiast who tries to find the most optimal solutions automating daily tasks. Believe that most of them can be done through simple yet effective micro programs.
Updated on April 25, 2020Comments
-
m1k3y3 about 4 years
I am trying to run python application and execute actions based on specified interval. Below code is consuming constantly 100% of CPU.
def action_print(): print "hello there" interval = 5 next_run = 0 while True: while next_run > time.time(): pass next_run = time.time() + interval action_print()
I would like to avoid putting process to sleep as there will be more actions to execute at various intervals.
please advise
-
Mat over 12 yearsIf you don't want to sleep one way or another, you'll burn CPU.
-
Fred Foo over 12 yearsCould you elaborate on "there will be more actions to execute at various intervals"?
-
m1k3y3 over 12 yearshow can I make sure everything gets executed on-time while process is sleeping? I tried to use sleep however anything that is less than a second eats up the cpu.
-
lpostula over 12 yearsDo you want this process to take 100% cpu?
-
m1k3y3 over 12 years@larsmans - i mean more actions are about to come not just print. whole problem is in intervals that are floats i.e. 3.5s, 4.73s etc.
-
Fred Foo over 12 years@m1k3y02: compute the exact moments at which actions have to be undertaken, then sleep until that time.
-
m1k3y3 over 12 years@kasmanit - I want to avoid high cpu consumption while it is waiting for new action, which may come all of a sudden
-
-
user1202733 over 12 yearsa process on my OSX box running while True:time.sleep(0.1) shows in top as 0.0% cpu usage.