Unix/Linux find and sort by date modified

280,656

Solution 1

Use this:

find . -printf "%T@ %Tc %p\n" | sort -n

printf arguments from man find:

  • %Tk: File's last modification time in the format specified by k.

  • @: seconds since Jan. 1, 1970, 00:00 GMT, with fractional part.

  • c: locale's date and time (Sat Nov 04 12:02:33 EST 1989).

  • %p: File's name.

Solution 2

The easiest method is to use zsh, thanks to its glob qualifiers.

print -lr -- $dir/**/$str*(om[1,10])

If you have GNU find, make it print the file modification times and sort by that.

find -type f -printf '%T@ %p\0' |
sort -zk 1nr |
sed -z 's/^[^ ]* //' | tr '\0' '\n' | head -n 10

If you have GNU find but not other GNU utilities, use newlines as separators instead of nulls; you'll lose support for filenames containing newlines.

find -type f -printf '%T@ %p\n' |
sort -k 1nr |
sed 's/^[^ ]* //' | head -n 10

If you have Perl (here I'll assume there are no newlines in file names):

find . -type f -print |
perl -l -ne '
    $_{$_} = -M;  # store file age (mtime - now)
    END {
        $,="\n";
        @sorted = sort {$_{$a} <=> $_{$b}} keys %_;  # sort by increasing age
        print @sorted[0..9];
    }'

If you have Python (also assuming no newlines in file names):

find . -type f -print |
python -c 'import os, sys; times = {}
for f in sys.stdin.readlines(): f = f[0:-1]; times[f] = os.stat(f).st_mtime
for f in (sorted(times.iterkeys(), key=lambda f:times[f], reverse=True))[:10]: print f'

There's probably a way to do the same in PHP, but I don't know it.

If you want to work with only POSIX tools, it's rather more complicated; see How to list files sorted by modification date recursively (no stat command available!) (retatining the first 10 is the easy part).

Solution 3

You don't need to PHP or Python, just ls:

man ls:
-t     sort by modification time
-r,    reverse order while sorting (--reverse )
-1     list one file per line

find /wherever/your/files/hide -type f -exec ls -1rt "{}" +;

If command * exits with a failure status (ie Argument list too long), then you can iterate with find. Paraphrased from: The maximum length of arguments for a new process

  • find . -print0|xargs -0 command (optimizes speed, if find doesn't implement "-exec +" but knows "-print0")
  • find . -print|xargs command (if there's no white space in the arguments)

If the major part of the arguments consists of long, absolute or relative paths, then try to move your actions into the directory: cd /directory/with/long/path; command * And another quick fix may be to match fewer arguments: command [a-e]*; command [f-m]*; ...

Solution 4

Extending user195696's answer:

find . -type f -printf "%T@\t%Tc %6k KiB %p\n" | sort -n | cut -f 2-

For each file, this first outputs the numeric timestamp (for sorting by, followed by tabulation \t), then a human-readable timestamp, then the filesize (unfortunately find's -printf can't do in mebibytes, only kibibytes), then the filename with relative path.

Then sort -n sorts it by the first numeric field.

Then cut gets rid of that first numeric field which is of no interest to the user. (Prints second field onward.) The default field separator is \t or tabulation.

Example of output:

Thu 06 Feb 2014 04:49:14 PM EST     64 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2_f7_10.class
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:08:30 AM EST 7962976 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2__rh_4e-4.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:23:24 AM EST 7962976 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2_f7_400_out_Model.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:23:24 AM EST      0 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2_f7_400_out.mph.status
Fri 07 Feb 2014 02:23:24 AM EST     64 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/1579678.out
Fri 07 Feb 2014 03:47:31 AM EST 8132224 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2__rh_1e-5.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 04:00:49 AM EST 8132224 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2_f7_10_out_Model.mph
Fri 07 Feb 2014 04:00:49 AM EST      0 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2_f7_10_out.mph.status
Fri 07 Feb 2014 04:00:49 AM EST     64 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/1579679.out
Fri 07 Feb 2014 09:47:18 AM EST   9280 KiB ./056_h2_f7_400/h2__rh_4e-4.mat
Fri 07 Feb 2014 10:51:23 AM EST   9728 KiB ./018_bidomain/h2_plain__rh_1e-5.mat
Fri 07 Feb 2014 10:58:33 AM EST   9568 KiB ./057_h2_f7_10/h2__rh_1e-5.mat
Fri 07 Feb 2014 05:05:38 PM EST     64 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary.java
Fri 07 Feb 2014 06:06:29 PM EST     32 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/slurm.slurm
Sat 08 Feb 2014 03:42:07 AM EST      0 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/1581061.err
Sat 08 Feb 2014 03:42:14 AM EST     64 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary.class
Sat 08 Feb 2014 03:58:28 AM EST  70016 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_1e-5.mph
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:40 AM EST  70304 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_4e-4.mph
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:53 AM EST  70304 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary_out_Model.mph
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:53 AM EST      0 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2_f7_stationary_out.mph.status
Sat 08 Feb 2014 04:12:53 AM EST     32 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/1581061.out
Mon 10 Feb 2014 11:40:54 AM EST    224 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_4e-4.mat
Mon 10 Feb 2014 11:42:32 AM EST    224 KiB ./058_h2_f7_stationary/h2s__rh_1e-5.mat
Mon 10 Feb 2014 11:50:08 AM EST     32 KiB ./plot_grid.m

I deliberately made the filesize field 6 characters, because if making it longer, it becomes hard to visually distinguish how large the files are. This way, files larger than 1e6 KiB jut out: by 1 char means 1-9 GB, by 2 chars means 10-99 GB, etc.


Edit: here's another version (since find . -printf "%Tc" crashes on MinGW/MSYS):

find . -type f -printf "%T@\t%p\n" | sort -n | cut -f 2- | xargs -I{} ls -Glath --si {}

Giving output like:

-rw-r--r-- 1 es 23K Jul 10  2010 ./laptop_0000071.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 43M Jul 29 19:19 ./work.xcf
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 87K Jul 29 20:11 ./patent_lamps/US Patent 274427 Maxim Lamp Holder.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 151K Jul 29 20:12 ./patent_lamps/Edison screw-in socket.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 50K Jul 29 20:13 ./patent_lamps/1157 Lamp.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 es 38K Jul 29 20:14 ./patent_lamps/US06919684-20050719-D00001.png

Where:

  • -I{} causes the occurrence of {} to be replaced by an argument, and newlines are now the argument separators (note the spaces in filenames above).

  • ls -G suppresses printing the group name (waste of space).

  • ls -h --si produces human-readable file sizes (more correct with --si).

  • ls -t sorts by time, which is irrelevant here, but that's what I typically use.

Solution 5

I have a simple solution that works for both FreeBSD (OS X) and Linux:

find . -type f -exec ls -t {} +
Share:
280,656

Related videos on Youtube

Peter Mortensen
Author by

Peter Mortensen

Updated on September 18, 2022

Comments

  • Peter Mortensen
    Peter Mortensen almost 2 years

    How can I do a simple find which would order the results by most recently modified?

    Here is the current find I am using (I am doing a shell escape in PHP, so that is the reasoning for the variables):

    find '$dir' -name '$str'\* -print | head -10
    

    How could I have this order the search by most recently modified? (Note I do not want it to sort 'after' the search, but rather find the results based on what was most recently modified.)

  • occulus
    occulus almost 12 years
    If there are a lot of files, this fails with 'Argument list too long' on the ls. Maybe recook to use xargs?
  • occulus
    occulus almost 12 years
    If there are a lot of files, this fails with 'Argument list too long' on the ls.
  • Ярослав Рахматуллин
    Ярослав Рахматуллин almost 12 years
    That's true, but I believe the question was "how do I do a simple find..."
  • Ivan Vučica
    Ivan Vučica about 11 years
    Sadly, this prints out localized month names on my Croatian setup, making sort incorrect.
  • Jake N
    Jake N about 11 years
    +1 Very useful, the first answer to this I have found with a readable/useful date output
  • jan
    jan almost 10 years
    I improved this sript to handle whitespace in filenames, see superuser.com/a/777007/134532
  • Tobu
    Tobu over 9 years
    ls doesn't quote file names in a way xargs can understand (no -0 option, and the various quote styles are inadequate)
  • Evgeni Sergeev
    Evgeni Sergeev over 9 years
    Note: to sort by file size instead, simply replace the T@ by s in either of the above commands.
  • Kef Schecter
    Kef Schecter almost 9 years
    My sed says it doesn't have a -z option.
  • Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'
    Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' almost 9 years
    @KefSchecter Then use newlines as separators, but you'll lose support for newlines in file names.
  • Aaron D. Marasco
    Aaron D. Marasco over 8 years
    But if xargs calls ls multiple times, the sort will be broken.
  • joelostblom
    joelostblom over 7 years
    I have this alias for finding recent files in my ~/.zshrc: fr () { find ./ -iname "*"$@"*" -printf "%T@ %Td-%Tb-%TY %Tk:%TM %p\n" | sort -n | cut -d " " -f 2- | grep -i "$@" ; } It recursively finds all files containing the pattern of the first argument passed to the command (fr <pattern>) and sorts them with the most recent one last.
  • Peter Mortensen
    Peter Mortensen over 7 years
    user195696's answer works for the Croatian setup (and others).
  • DavidPostill
    DavidPostill over 7 years
    This doesn't sort by date modified.
  • Goblinhack
    Goblinhack over 6 years
    The above is for python2. If you only have python3, some small changes: python3 -c 'import os, sys; times = {} for f in sys.stdin.readlines(): f = f[0:-1]; times[f] = os.stat(f).st_mtime for f in (sorted(times.keys(), key=lambda f:times[f], reverse=True))[:10]: print(f);'
  • user74094
    user74094 over 6 years
    This fails for files with spaces in their names. Any advice?
  • Varun Chandak
    Varun Chandak over 5 years
    This is great !!! To use with symlinks, use find -L ...
  • Ludovic Kuty
    Ludovic Kuty over 5 years
    You may want to use ssed to get rid of the seconds fractional part and stil use ISO8601 as @PeterMortensen showed : find . -type f -printf "%TY-%Tm-%TdT%TT %p\n" | sort -r | ssed -R 's/^([^.]+)\.\d+ (.*)$/\1 \2/'
  • Ludovic Kuty
    Ludovic Kuty over 5 years
    @joelostblom JFYI, instead of cut -d " " -f 2- you may want to use cut -d " " -f 1 --complement but it is longer.
  • RocketNuts
    RocketNuts over 5 years
    Just stumbled upon this answer and it was exactly what I needed in a similar situation. Question: what does the +; at the end do? It seems to give the same result without the ; however it does not work without the + ?
  • Premium
    Premium about 5 years
    This is just the same as another answer posted 8 months before, except for the part about using "ls -1rt `find …`", which is broken
  • Peter Mortensen
    Peter Mortensen about 5 years
    For ISO 8601 date output with time zone information, use find . -printf "%TY-%Tm-%TdT%TT %TZ %p\n" . As it sorts naturally, it can also, like the Unix time in this answer, be used directly in the sort: find . -printf "%TY-%Tm-%TdT%TT %TZ %p\n" | sort -n. Note that the date information is not in ISO 8601 format (e.g. "CEDT" - Central European Daylight Time). (My original comment (now deleted) had a number of flaws, in particular the use of the access time instead of the modification time.)
  • digitaltoast
    digitaltoast about 5 years
    This works perfectly - should be correct answer, or at least higher rated!
  • F. Hauri
    F. Hauri almost 5 years
    cut -d ' ' -f 2 will break if filenames contain spaces.
  • jturi
    jturi over 4 years
    find . -type f -exec ls -lat {} + gives you a better picture with date and time showing if somebody needs this format
  • Sumomo
    Sumomo over 3 years
    This blog post explains and expands on the solution: elsewebdevelopment.com/…
  • ttq
    ttq about 3 years
    Note that for OSX one has to use the GNU version gfind instead of find, since printf is not part of POSIX find. It can be installed with brew install findutils.
  • mekb
    mekb almost 3 years
    this one seems to be the quickest
  • phdoerfler
    phdoerfler over 2 years
    getting the error paths must precede expression? Make sure you got -printf and not -print
  • HKTonyLee
    HKTonyLee over 2 years
    This should be the best answer. Simple, easy to understand. The key is the plus sign in the end. This allows the find to call ls once only.
  • Wermerb
    Wermerb about 2 years
    Your #2 solution works (it's the only one I've tried). The answer checked as "valid" doen't work properly (not the last touched files).