What's the difference between "uname -r" and "uname -v"?
This is absolutely normal and expected. kernel-release
will always show the actual version number of the used kernel. kernel-version
however will print a more specific string with the actual release date. Its format depends on which Linux or Unix distribution it's run on.
You can find an extensive list of examples on Wikipedia. For example, in OS X, the kernel-version
will be not only the release number, but also the release date:
Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 16:32:41 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_X86_64
While the kernel-release
is simply the release number:
10.8.0
You can even check /proc/sys/kernel/
for the things uname(2)
will look up when it's called by uname(1)
. This would be:
/proc/sys/kernel/version
/proc/sys/kernel/osrelease
Don't think too strictly of "version" as just a version number.
Related videos on Youtube
Comments
-
max over 1 year
I am using CentOS 6.2. In the man page of uname (i.e.,
man uname
), it says:-r, --kernel-release print the kernel release -v, --kernel-version print the kernel version
While trying the command, it shows
[max@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686 [max@localhost ~]$ uname -v #1 SMP Tue May 15 22:09:39 BST 2012
-v
should show the version, right? But where is it showing the version?-r
is showing the version detail.Why is this so?
-
don_crissti about 8 yearsObviously the right answer, whether the other poster disagrees or not.