What does bundle exec rake mean?

Question

What does bundle exec rake db:migrate mean? Or just bundle exec rake <command> in general?

I understand that bundle takes care of maintaining things in the Gemfile. I know what the word "exec" means. I understand that rake maintains all the different scripty things you can do, and I know that db:migrate is one of those. I just don't know what all these words are doing together. Why should bundle be used to execute rake to execute a database migrate?

Solution 1

bundle exec is a Bundler command to execute a script in the context of the current bundle (the one from your directory's Gemfile). rake db:migrate is the script where db is the namespace and migrate is the task name defined.

So bundle exec rake db:migrate executes the rake script with the command db:migrate in the context of the current bundle.

As to the "why?" I'll quote from the bundler page:

In some cases, running executables without bundle exec may work, if the executable happens to be installed in your system and does not pull in any gems that conflict with your bundle.

However, this is unreliable and is the source of considerable pain. Even if it looks like it works, it may not work in the future or on another machine.

Solution 2

You're running bundle exec on a program. The program's creators wrote it when certain versions of gems were available. The program Gemfile specifies the versions of the gems the creators decided to use. That is, the script was made to run correctly against these gem versions.

Your system-wide Gemfile may differ from this Gemfile. You may have newer or older gems with which this script doesn't play nice. This difference in versions can give you weird errors.

bundle exec helps you avoid these errors. It executes the script using the gems specified in the script's Gemfile rather than the systemwide Gemfile. It executes the certain gem versions with the magic of shell aliases.

See more on the man page.

Here's an example Gemfile:

source 'http://rubygems.org'

gem 'rails', '2.8.3'

Here, bundle exec would execute the script using rails version 2.8.3 and not some other version you may have installed system-wide.

Solution 3

This comes up a lot when your gemfile.lock has different versions of the gems installed on your machine. You may get a warning after running rake (or rspec or others) such as:

You have already activated rake 10.3.1, but your Gemfile requires rake 10.1.0. Prepending "bundle exec" to your command may solve this.

Prepending bundle exec tells the bundler to execute this command regardless of the version differential. There isn't always an issue, however, you might run into problems.

Fortunately, there is a gem that solves this: rubygems-bundler.

$ gem install rubygems-bundler

$ $ gem regenerate_binstubs

Then try your rake, rspec, or whatever again.

Solution 4

It should probably be mentioned, that there are ways to omit bundle exec (they are all stated in chapter 3.6.1 of Michael Hartls Ruby on Rails Tutorial book).

The simplest is to just use a sufficiently up-to-date version of RVM (>= 1.11.x).

If you're restricted to an earlier version of RVM, you can always use this method also mentioned by calasyr:

$ rvm get head && rvm reload
$ chmod +x $rvm_path/hooks/after_cd_bundler
$ bundle install --binstubs=./bundler_stubs

The bundler_stubs directory should then also be added to the .gitignore file.

A third option is to use the rubygems-bundler gem if you're not using RVM:

$ gem install rubygems-bundler
$ gem regenerate_binstubs

Solution 5

I have not used bundle exec much, but am setting it up now.

I have had instances where the wrong rake was used and much time wasted tracking down the problem. This helps you avoid that.

Here's how to set up RVM so you can use bundle exec by default within a specific project directory:

https://thoughtbot.com/blog/use-bundlers-binstubs

View more solutions