Why does clang/llvm on windows require Visual Studio's Link.exe?

10,778

Solution 1

Because no one has written a linker for LLVM.

There is a project to do so (called, unimaginatively lld) but it's not ready yet.

See http://lld.llvm.org for more details.

On the mac, people use Apple's linker, ld.

On Linux, most people use the gnu linker, usually (also) named ld

Solution 2

Try MinGW-W64's ld. I've been using it with llvm's clang instead of VS tools that I used for building clang in the first place.

Share:
10,778
Ephemera
Author by

Ephemera

Updated on July 18, 2022

Comments

  • Ephemera
    Ephemera almost 2 years

    According to LLVM's Getting Started (Windows) site:

    ... Clang can be used to emit bitcode, directly emit object files or even linked executables using Visual Studio’s link.exe.

    Why is the use of Link.exe on Windows necessary? And, for that matter, what is used on Mac/Linux? Further down it says:

    Compile the program to object code using the LLC code generator:
        C:\..> llc -filetype=obj hello.bc
    Link to binary using Microsoft link:
        C:\..> link hello.obj -defaultlib:libcmt
    

    Why can't LLC perform that last step? LLI seems to work fine so I assume that it interoperates with link.exe somehow under the hood - why can't LLC?

  • user541686
    user541686 over 11 years
    I guess this means LLVM doesn't do LTO?
  • Eli Bendersky
    Eli Bendersky over 11 years
    @Mehrdad: LLVM does LTO on IR level. But even if an executable is produced from a single .s file, it still has to be linked.
  • SK-logic
    SK-logic over 11 years
    @Mehrdad, both gold and Mac ld can use LLVM plugin for LTO.
  • mrh1997
    mrh1997 almost 5 years
    lld is supported on windows in the meantime