Yahoo Domain Keys setup, getting dkim=permerror (no key)

14,786

You do not have the proper dns records set up.

You can test it youself with policy checker and selector checker. Here is a good tutorial for setting the right records. and also and online form for doing the same. It seems that you have SPF records. You should definitely remove them! Here is a case against spf.

Share:
14,786

Related videos on Youtube

Ian
Author by

Ian

Updated on September 17, 2022

Comments

  • Ian
    Ian almost 2 years

    I'm working on getting DKIM installed on my outgoing mail server, to help my email deliverability to my Yahoo clients (all legit emails, etc, no spamming).

    I've got DKIM-Signature: and DomainKey-Signature: headers being generated, but a test mailer to my Yahoo account had this line in the headers:

    Authentication-Results: mta250.mail.re2.yahoo.com from=example.com; domainkeys=permerror (no key); from=example.com; dkim=permerror (no key)

    Any ideas what I may have missed?

    • user649102
      user649102 about 15 years
      Did you set the proper dns records? What is your domain name?
  • Ian
    Ian about 15 years
    my primary use for spf is delivering email to gmail.com. is there an alternative? does gmail support dkim?
  • user649102
    user649102 about 15 years
    yes gmail supports dkim
  • Ian
    Ian about 15 years
    so basically DKIM can be seen as a non-bad replacement for spf?
  • user649102
    user649102 about 15 years
    Yes something like that.
  • user5401
    user5401 about 15 years
    Certain big ESPs (like Hotmail) still use SPF and not DKIM, so I wouldn't suggest removing it.
  • Dan
    Dan over 14 years
    You need to support SPF, DKIM and DomainKeys they are all really needed. Google/Hotmail use DKIM, Yahoo uses DomainKeys and many others use SPF. There is no reason not to use all three.
  • user649102
    user649102 over 14 years
    @Dan you should really read the link in my answer. homepages.tesco.net/J.deBoynePollard/FGA/…
  • MrGigu
    MrGigu over 11 years
    I've had to remove the link from this post as it has gone dead. This is why we ask people to include the relevant parts of their links in the post body.
  • Mixologic
    Mixologic over 11 years
    @cstamas: that article you refer to is severely outdated, written when there was still some debate about whether or not to use SPF. None of the reasons given by Mr. Pollard have stood the test of time, and SPF is a perfectly valid tool advocated by the majority of major email systems.
  • user649102
    user649102 over 11 years
    @Mixologic with all due respect I disagree with that.