Do I not understand the flex-grow property?

41,071

Solution 1

You have to specify a value for flex-basis as well (not specifying this property causes behaviour similar to using the initial value, auto).

Add flex-basis: 0; to both children or just set it with the shorthand:

.flex-item {
    flex: 1; /* flex-basis is 0 if omitted */
}
.big {
    flex-grow: 3;
}

http://codepen.io/anon/pen/JEcBa

Solution 2

Flex-grow is commonly misunderstood in this way. Flex-grow only controls how the left over space is distributed between flex items, not how big they are in proportion to each other.

What you're looking for is really just this:

.flex-item {
  width: 25%;
  list-style-type:none;
  border:1px solid black;
}
.big {
  width: 75%;
}

See also

Solution 3

Authors are encouraged to control flexibility using the flex shorthand rather than with flex-grow directly, as the shorthand correctly resets any unspecified components to accommodate common uses.

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#propdef-flex-grow

.flex-item {
   flex: 1;
}
.big {
   flex: 3;
}

This is a working example

http://codepen.io/anon/pen/VjZYPV

Share:
41,071
Ethan C
Author by

Ethan C

BA Computer Science from Drake University, 2014 Owner of Sterner Stuff Design Experience in: PHP, Javascript, jQuery, Angular, WordPress, Laravel, Vue.js, Yii, HTML, CSS

Updated on July 09, 2022

Comments

  • Ethan C
    Ethan C almost 2 years

    I'm afraid I must not understand flex-grow. If you jump to the JSFiddle below - the way I understand it, .big should be three times the size of the other .flex-item. As you can see, not so. Why?

    http://jsfiddle.net/nrur6mmo/

    .flex-container {
        display:flex;
        padding:0 20%;
    }
    .flex-item {
        flex-grow:1;
        list-style-type:none;
        border:1px solid black;
    }
    .big {
        flex-grow:3;
    }
    <ul class="flex-container">
        <li class="flex-item big">Why isn't this exactly three times the size of the other one?</li>
        <li class="flex-item">Not really working like expected I don't think...</li>
    </ul>