execute a shell-script from Python subprocess
Using the subprocess
library, you can tell the Popen
class that you want to manage the standard input of the process like this:
import subprocess
shellscript = subprocess.Popen(["shellscript.sh"], stdin=subprocess.PIPE)
Now shellscript.stdin
is a file-like object on which you can call write
:
shellscript.stdin.write("yes\n")
shellscript.stdin.close()
returncode = shellscript.wait() # blocks until shellscript is done
You can also get standard out and standard error from a process by setting stdout=subprocess.PIPE
and stderr=subprocess.PIPE
, but you shouldn't use PIPEs
for both standard input and standard output, because deadlock could result. (See the documentation.) If you need to pipe in and pipe out, use the communicate
method instead of the file-like objects:
shellscript = subprocess.Popen(["shellscript.sh"], stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
stdout, stderr = shellscript.communicate("yes\n") # blocks until shellscript is done
returncode = shellscript.returncode
Comments
-
theAlse almost 4 years
I need to call a shellscript from python. The problem is that the shellscript will ask a couple of questions along the way until it is finished.
I can't find a way to do so using
subprocess
! (usingpexpect
seems a bit over-kill since I only need to start it and send a couple of YES to it)PLEASE don't suggest ways that requires modification to the shell-script!
-
jfs almost 11 yearsstdout, stderr should be set in the second Popen call otherwise
.communicate()
returnsNone
s (no redirection) -
Jim Pivarski almost 11 yearsAh, right--- that's what I meant, but I'll edit the answer to be more explicit. (Or, maybe you already did? Anyway, looks right to me now.)
-
jfs almost 11 yearsalso, you could
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
to avoidsubprocess.
prefix for readability