freenas zfs read performance sucks .. why?
You may want to read this.
Essentially, in a single RAID Z group, read performance is equal to the performance of a single disk. RAID Z is great for write performance and poor for read performance. Given the slow low-end disks you're using, the numbers you've posted seem reasonable.
If you want to use RAID Z and still have reasonable read performance, you'll have to create multiple RAID Z groups (which you don't have disks for) and stripe across them.
With four disks, you may be best off creating two mirrors and striping data across them.
Related videos on Youtube
Manuel
Hi there, I'm a Digital & Technology Evangelist! I helps customers to evolve ideas to business models and solutions and realizes them. My strength? I combine business knowledge, a growth & lean startup mindset, coaching and methodology like design thinking, business model canvas (bmc) value proposition design (vpd) with latest state of the art technologies. Technologie vise I focuse on cloud, aws serverless, progressive web applications (pwa) and augmented reality (ar/mr). Currently I'm working as a consultant at OPITZ CONSULTING. Having the OC|Lab in my background I can offer companies a lab and innovation space to realize and test new ideas!
Updated on September 18, 2022Comments
-
Manuel almost 2 years
I just set up a freenas zfs raid-z2 with 4 drives sata enterprise drives and doing some performance tests. Right now I'm pushing and pulling linux images into the storage. My notebook has a samsung 840pro ssd with 400MB/s local read write speed. Samba4 is used.
I can write with avg 105 MB/s in an continuous stream. I'm impressed, this is is really fine thinking of a 1Gb/s lan.
However reading is pretty slow and network io is jumping from a few kB to 30MB/s probably in avg. about 10MB/s. Adding a l2arc doesn't help.
Any ideas, why the reading performance is so poor? is this normal?
-
Manuel over 10 yearsMy sata drives seem to be not to bad. just run xdd on the server. I can write up to 2000MB/s random access. Reading single files I end up with 600MB/s. Multiple reads up to 1200MB/s My problem was my local virus scanner, checking incoming traffic. Deactivating it I ended up with 80MB/s incoming over samba. Reading your link raidz2 should rise performance, however adding more devices wouldn't increase performance much. Keeping in mind that most files are >1MB and my lan is limited to 2Gb/s mirroring wouldn't increase performance a lot. If I had small junks I'd agree to mirroring.
-
Manuel over 10 yearsDo you have any experiences with l2arc?