How to use the CancellationToken property?

235,660

Solution 1

You can implement your work method as follows:

private static void Work(CancellationToken cancelToken)
{
    while (true)
    {
        if(cancelToken.IsCancellationRequested)
        {
            return;
        }
        Console.Write("345");
    }
}

That's it. You always need to handle cancellation by yourself - exit from method when it is appropriate time to exit (so that your work and data is in consistent state)

UPDATE: I prefer not writing while (!cancelToken.IsCancellationRequested) because often there are few exit points where you can stop executing safely across loop body, and loop usually have some logical condition to exit (iterate over all items in collection etc.). So I believe it's better not to mix that conditions as they have different intention.

Cautionary note about avoiding CancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested():

Comment in question by Eamon Nerbonne:

... replacing ThrowIfCancellationRequested with a bunch of checks for IsCancellationRequested exits gracefully, as this answer says. But that's not just an implementation detail; that affects observable behavior: the task will no longer end in the cancelled state, but in RanToCompletion. And that can affect not just explicit state checks, but also, more subtly, task chaining with e.g. ContinueWith, depending on the TaskContinuationOptions used. I'd say that avoiding ThrowIfCancellationRequested is dangerous advice.

Solution 2

You can create a Task with cancellation token, when you app goto background you can cancel this token.

You can do this in PCL https://developer.xamarin.com/guides/xamarin-forms/application-fundamentals/app-lifecycle

var cancelToken = new CancellationTokenSource();
Task.Factory.StartNew(async () => {
    await Task.Delay(10000);
    // call web API
}, cancelToken.Token);

//this stops the Task:
cancelToken.Cancel(false);

Anther solution is user Timer in Xamarin.Forms, stop timer when app goto background https://xamarinhelp.com/xamarin-forms-timer/

Solution 3

You have to pass the CancellationToken to the Task, which will periodically monitors the token to see whether cancellation is requested.

// CancellationTokenSource provides the token and have authority to cancel the token
CancellationTokenSource cancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();
CancellationToken token = cancellationTokenSource.Token;  

// Task need to be cancelled with CancellationToken 
Task task = Task.Run(async () => {     
  while(!token.IsCancellationRequested) {
      Console.Write("*");         
      await Task.Delay(1000);
  }
}, token);

Console.WriteLine("Press enter to stop the task"); 
Console.ReadLine(); 
cancellationTokenSource.Cancel(); 

In this case, the operation will end when cancellation is requested and the Task will have a RanToCompletion state. If you want to be acknowledged that your task has been cancelled, you have to use ThrowIfCancellationRequested to throw an OperationCanceledException exception.

Task task = Task.Run(async () =>             
{                 
    while (!token.IsCancellationRequested) {
         Console.Write("*");                      
         await Task.Delay(1000);                
    }           
    token.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();               
}, token)
.ContinueWith(t =>
 {
      t.Exception?.Handle(e => true);
      Console.WriteLine("You have canceled the task");
 },TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnCanceled);  
 
Console.WriteLine("Press enter to stop the task");                 
Console.ReadLine();                 
cancellationTokenSource.Cancel();                 
task.Wait(); 

Hope this helps to understand better.

Solution 4

You can use ThrowIfCancellationRequested without handling the exception!

The use of ThrowIfCancellationRequested is meant to be used from within a Task (not a Thread). When used within a Task, you do not have to handle the exception yourself (and get the Unhandled Exception error). It will result in leaving the Task, and the Task.IsCancelled property will be True. No exception handling needed.

In your specific case, change the Thread to a Task.

Task t = null;
try
{
    t = Task.Run(() => Work(cancelSource.Token), cancelSource.Token);
}

if (t.IsCancelled)
{
    Console.WriteLine("Canceled!");
}
Share:
235,660
Fulproof
Author by

Fulproof

Updated on July 08, 2022

Comments

  • Fulproof
    Fulproof almost 2 years

    Compared to the preceding code for class RulyCanceler, I wanted to run code using CancellationTokenSource.

    How do I use it as mentioned in Cancellation Tokens, i.e. without throwing/catching an exception? Can I use the IsCancellationRequested property?

    I attempted to use it like this:

    cancelToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
    

    and

    try
    {
      new Thread(() => Work(cancelSource.Token)).Start();
    }
    catch (OperationCanceledException)
    {
      Console.WriteLine("Canceled!");
    }
    

    but this gave a run-time error on cancelToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested(); in method Work(CancellationToken cancelToken):

    System.OperationCanceledException was unhandled
      Message=The operation was canceled.
      Source=mscorlib
      StackTrace:
           at System.Threading.CancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested()
           at _7CancellationTokens.Token.Work(CancellationToken cancelToken) in C:\xxx\Token.cs:line 33
           at _7CancellationTokens.Token.<>c__DisplayClass1.<Main>b__0() in C:\xxx\Token.cs:line 22
           at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart_Context(Object state)
           at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state, Boolean ignoreSyncCtx)
           at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(ExecutionContext executionContext, ContextCallback callback, Object state)
           at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart()
      InnerException:
    

    The code that I successfully ran caught the OperationCanceledException in the new thread:

    using System;
    using System.Threading;
    namespace _7CancellationTokens
    {
      internal class Token
      {
        private static void Main()
        {
          var cancelSource = new CancellationTokenSource();
          new Thread(() =>
          {
             try
             {
               Work(cancelSource.Token); //).Start();
             }
             catch (OperationCanceledException)
             {
                Console.WriteLine("Canceled!");
             }
             }).Start();
    
          Thread.Sleep(1000);
          cancelSource.Cancel(); // Safely cancel worker.
          Console.ReadLine();
        }
        private static void Work(CancellationToken cancelToken)
        {
          while (true)
          {
            Console.Write("345");
            cancelToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
          }
        }
      }
    }
    
  • Fulproof
    Fulproof about 11 years
    Thanks! This does not follow from the online text, quite authoritative (book "C# 4.0 in a Nutshell"?) I cited. Could you give me a reference about "always"?
  • Sasha
    Sasha about 11 years
    This comes from practice and experience =). I can't remember where from I know this. I used "you always need" because you actually can interrupt the worker thread with exception from outside using Thread.Abort(), but that's a very bad practice. By the way, using CancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested() is also "handle cancellation by yourself", just the other way to do it.
  • BrainSlugs83
    BrainSlugs83 about 10 years
    ^ that's correct. It would just be instead of the if block above you would put cancelToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();. Sometimes the documentation / books are off (even when written by MVPs, etc.) -- it's unfortunate, but maybe it will be fixed in the next edition. In the meanwhile, perhaps you can check if the book has an online errata site (and if the mistake isn't mentioned, perhaps you can submit your findings to the author for future correction).
  • Doug Dawson
    Doug Dawson about 10 years
    Can you do while(!cancelToken.IsCancellationRequested)?
  • Sasha
    Sasha about 10 years
    @DougDawson, sure you can. That just adds one more level of indention and Resharper recommends not doing this as it reduces code redability.
  • Doug Dawson
    Doug Dawson about 10 years
    @OleksandrPshenychnyy I meant replace while(true) with while(!cancelToken.IsCancellationRequested). This was helpful! Thanks!
  • user3285954
    user3285954 almost 10 years
    @Fulproof There's no generic way for a runtime to cancel running code because runtimes are not smart enough to know where a process can be interrupted. In some cases it is possible to simply exit a loop, in other cases more complex logic is needed, ie transactions have to be rolled back, resources have to be released (eg file handles or network connections). This is why there no magical way of canceling a task without having to write some code. What you think of is like killing a process but that's not cancel that's one of the worst things can happen to an application because can't clean up.
  • user3285954
    user3285954 almost 10 years
    while (!cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested) { DoWork(); }
  • user3285954
    user3285954 almost 9 years
    @Oleksandr Pshenychnyy Re your update. Your code sample is an endless loop this is why IsCancellationRequested could be used as exit condition. If you want to illustrate exit condition use while (workIsNotCompleted) ...
  • Sasha
    Sasha almost 9 years
    @user3285954, it is just an example. Depending on your needs loop exit condition may be different - it doesn't affect the subject of the thread. By the way, there might be many exit points from the loop - everything depending on concrete problem you solve.
  • Xander Luciano
    Xander Luciano over 7 years
    Why are you using t.Start() and not Task.Run()?
  • Titus
    Titus over 7 years
    @XanderLuciano: In this example there is no specific reason, and Task.Run() would have been the better choice.
  • Marc L.
    Marc L. about 6 years
    Cancellation of async workflows becomes complex quickly, and the "it depends" nature of the commentary is nice, but there is a reason the "default" (or maybe "initial go-to") method for handling cancellation is ThrowIfCancellationRequested(): namely, unless the signature or naming comminicate that cancellation is "normal" for the method, cancellation should be considered an abnormal halt. See here, especially the initial commentary by Toub and Liddell. This answer should be edited.
  • kosist
    kosist almost 4 years
    What will happen if I initialize CancellationToken parameter in the method as None, so no new CancellationTokenSource is created? I start method as PeriodicCheck(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(60), CancellationToken.None), and when I stop WPF application, everything stops fine. Should I create CancellationTokenSource all the time, or just when I want to manage when process should be stopped?
  • Sasha
    Sasha almost 4 years
    @kosist You can use CancellationToken.None if you do not plan to cancel the operation you are starting manually. Of course when system process is killed, everything is interrupted and CancellationToken has nothing to do with that. So yes, you should only create CancellationTokenSource if you really need to use it to cancel the operation. There is no sense creating something you do not use.
  • Marc L.
    Marc L. over 3 years
    Two problems. First, use Task.Run(). Second, this will not cancel the underlying awaited Task the way you think it will. In this case, you would need to pass cancelToken to the delay: Task.Delay(10000, cancelToken). Cancellation via token is cooperative. It needs to be passed down to every awaitable that you would like to be able to cancel in the chain.
  • Marc L.
    Marc L. over 3 years
    Regarding point #2 above, see section "CancellationToken" here.
  • Toolkit
    Toolkit over 3 years
    you are not showing ThrowIfCancellationRequested
  • Peter Bruins
    Peter Bruins over 2 years
    Why is the cancelationToken not passed down to the Task.Delay()?