Mount NTFS partition at startup, with non-root user as owner

90,378

Solution 1

In the options column add permissions and auto (and probably user or users)

nls=iso8859-1,permissions,users,auto
  • permissions: (NTFS-3G option) Set standard permissions on created files and use standard access control.
  • auto: Will be mounted at boot and from mount -a
  • user: Allow an ordinary user to mount the filesystem
  • users: Allow every user to mount and unmount the filesystem

Then change ownership of the filesystem:

sudo chown -R thomas:thomas /media/data 

My line in /etc/fstab

/dev/sda5 /media/ntfs ntfs-3g users,permissions,auto 0 0

Mount and list permissions

sudo mount /media/ntfs
Using default user mapping

bodhi@ufbt:~$ ls -l /media

drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 2012-01-04 17:08 ntfs

Change ownership and list new permissions

bodhi@ufbt:~$ sudo chown bodhi:bodhi /media/ntfs

bodhi@ufbt:~$ ls -l /media

drwxr-xr-x 1 bodhi bodhi 4096 2012-01-04 17:10 ntfs

By default, ntfs-3g mounts the partition noexec, nosuid, and nodev.

  • noexec: Do not allow direct execution of any binaries on the mounted filesystem.
  • nosuid: Do not allow set-user-identifier or set-group-identifier bits to take effect.
  • nodev: Do not interpret character or block special devices on the file system.

To override this and allow executing files, use exec

/dev/sda5 /media/ntfs ntfs-3g exec,permissions,auto 0 0

Now we get

bodhi@ufbt:~$ ls -l /media/ntfs

-rwx------ 1 bodhi bodhi 28 2012-01-04 17:16 file

bodhi@ufbt:~$ /media/ntfs/file
It works

Solution 2

Use the uid and gid options (or use the user mapping feature) of mount.ntfs (8)

Solution 3

Mine works now perfectly when i change the fstab's line to

UUID=761C84B31C846FC3 /media/d        ntfs    defaults,umask=022,uid=1000 0       0

Solution 4

What about using udisks? It can easily mount NTFS partitions with your user as owner.

Example (type it into command line):

/usr/bin/udisks --mount /dev/sda3

You can also add that command to startup applications and it will auto-mount when you log-in.

Reference: AutomaticallyMountPartitions

Share:
90,378
Tomas Aschan
Author by

Tomas Aschan

I am an engineering physicist from Stockholm, Sweden, with a passionate interest in programming and software architecture. Since creating my first program at age 12 (a VB6 app that showed a smiley when a button was clicked) I've spent many hours in front of my computer, watching screen casts and reading blogs about programming as well as trying all the new concepts out in my own programs. With a Master's degree in Engineering Physics from the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, I have deepened my modelling and reasoning skills, as well as had the opportunity to try out many different technologies and tools. I am currently working as a software engineer at Spotify, mostly massaging data to enable our internal research into developer productivity.

Updated on September 18, 2022

Comments

  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 1 year

    I'm currently mounting an NTFS partition at startup using the following line in /etc/fstab:

    /dev/sda3        /media/data           ntfs      nls=iso8859-1,umask=000
    

    To my Ubuntu 11.10 installation, it looks as if all files and folders are owned by root - and since NTFS doesn't really support the same rights management system anyway, there's no way I can change it after the mount is complete. No matter what I do, ls -l anywhere on the NTFS partition will list every file and folder as owned by root:root.

    However, this causes some problems for me. Most notably, some applicaitons running under my account (called tomas) complain about access rights. Also, whenever I try to copy (cp) or move (mv) files from one of my ext3 partitions to the NTFS partition, I get error messages saying

    mv: preserving times for `[path to new file]`: Operation not permitted
    

    or, similarly

    mv: preserving permissions for ...
    

    Would mounting the partition in my name instead of root help? If so, how do I accomplish that in fstab?


    Update:

    I have now changed the options according to the suggestions, and arrived at this:

    nls=iso8859-1,permissions,users,umask=000,uid=tomas,gid=tomas
    

    ls -l now shows all files owned by me instead of by root, and it seems some of the problems I had before are solved. However, not all of them.

    When I start Eclipse, I get an error that a file related to the android-sdk cannot be run: Permission denied. ls -l tells me the following about the file:

    -rwxrwxrwx 1 tomas tomas 159620 2011-11-29 14:50 adb*
    

    This looks the way I want it to. But if I try to run it (./adb in a terminal) I also get permission denied errors. But if I run it with sudo, it works (I believe - at least it doesn't give me an error message, but it doesn't give me any output at all, which I think it shouldn't...)

    Why is the above file, with execute permissions for anyone, still not executable by anyone else than root? How do I change the way I mount the file system so it is?


    Update 2:

    OK, I've now come a little bit further. By mounting with these options

    nls=iso8859-1,permissions,users,auto
    

    I got all the permissions set the way I expect them to, and chown and chmod actually change settings on the files (at least according to ls -l) =D

    BUT my system still behaves in a weird way. The permissions for the adb script file come up as above, but neither I nor Eclipse can run it without "Permission denied" errors. But as far as I can see the file has all the required flags set (o=rwx should be enough, right?). Why doesn't it work?


    Update 3

    OK, I got everything working on the Ubuntu side, with the following options:

    nls=iso8859-1,permissions,users,auto,exec
    

    However, when I try to access files on the partition from Windows, the security settings are all messed up. On all the files (of those few I've examined) a new account called Account Unknown(long GUID) has been added to the list of users, and has full rights. Rigths for most other users are decreased so that I don't have rights to do stuff I expect. Notably "Everyone" does no longer seem to have right to "Traverse folder / execute".

    This might be solvable by just selecting the partition and allow Everyone to do anything on the root folder, and then tell it to do it recursively, but I'd rather not as I'm afraid it will take days to complete...

    • Admin
      Admin over 12 years
      From mount(8) : users Allow every user to mount and unmount the filesystem. This option implies the options noexec, ... unless overridden by subsequent options, as in the option line users,exec,dev,suid). So add exec to your options and I believe the permission denied issue for execution should be resolved.
    • Admin
      Admin over 7 years
      Did you ever get this solved after Update 3? ... I tried at one point to do a rsync backup of my linux system to an extra ntfs drive I had, but after a great deal of searching, came to the conclusion that I could never put the full array of linux file system information onto a ntfs fs. (Well perhaps I could come close as you have done above, but in the end linux doesn't map very well onto ntfs.)
    • Admin
      Admin over 7 years
      @Elipticalview: This is long ago, and I don't have the same computer anymore. Did you try the accepted answer?
  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 12 years
    Hm... after adding that to fstab (making hte options column the following: nls=iso8859-1,permissions,users,umask=000) and rebooting I can now move and copy files without error messages. All files still show up as owned by root:root though, even after sudo chown -R tomas:tomas /media/data. It doesn't seem to be a problem for now, but out of curiosity: why is that?
  • Panther
    Panther over 12 years
    I think because of your umask=000
  • psusi
    psusi over 12 years
    In other words, add uid=whoever to the fstab line
  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 12 years
    No, umask=000 is equivalent to chmod 777 - umask defines all the flags you don't want to set on the files. I agree it's counterintuitive, but it's all here: ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=9092899&postcount=4
  • Panther
    Panther over 12 years
    uid and gid work, but permissions are now supported in ntfs-3g, and those options over ride the permissions option. See: b.andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/permissions.html
  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 12 years
    I've updated my question with further info about what I've tried and the results.
  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 12 years
    I've updated my question with further info of what I've tried and the results I got. Please take a look =)
  • Panther
    Panther over 12 years
    The permissions option should work with chown and chmod
  • Panther
    Panther over 12 years
    See the information I included in my answer.
  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 12 years
    Ha! When I added exec as well, everything worked! Thanks a lot!
  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 12 years
    Hm... I'll have to un-mark this for the time being: it turns out, this messed up the permissions when reading the files from Windows...
  • Panther
    Panther over 12 years
    Check out the link I gave earlier: b.andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/permissions.html It shows how to map users properly. I've not used it as I do not use Windows and I hear Microsoft made some changes to ntfs with windows 7. Good luck to you.
  • Panther
    Panther over 12 years
    And a more detailed example here: b.andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/example.html
  • Tomas Aschan
    Tomas Aschan over 12 years
    I've tried following the tutorials now, but I suspect I'm having problems with the mappings file. Please read my update for my a description of the symptoms.
  • binga30
    binga30 over 10 years
    Should be sudo chown -R... rather than sudo -R chown ....
  • Khurshid Alam
    Khurshid Alam almost 9 years
    @bodhi.zazen My fstab is UUID=B870533B7052FF94 /media/TEMP ntfs-3g exec,permissions,u‌​sers,auto,locale=en_‌​IN 0 0.....but with this every new directory gets drwxrwxrwx and file gets -rw-rw-rw- permission. Is that ok? Usually I want 775 for directories and 664 for files. But if I change that will I be able to access file from windows?
  • rbrito
    rbrito almost 9 years
    Right, the magic piece here is the permissions option (which, unfortunately, udisks (or udisks2) doesn't let you pass via udisksctl).
  • endolith
    endolith over 7 years
    "In the options column add "permissions" and auto (and probably user or users)" Can you explain what these do?
  • Panther
    Panther over 7 years
    @endolith - see man mount. permissions allows you to set permissions, auto means it automatically mounts at boot, and users means users can mount and unmount (not just root). linux.die.net/man/8/mount
  • Panther
    Panther over 7 years
  • Rajat Pandita
    Rajat Pandita over 7 years
    Works fine for me!
  • Vishal Kumar Sahu
    Vishal Kumar Sahu about 2 years
    For me this doesn't work at startup in Ubuntu 20 LTS drive still remains belonging to root user. I created symbolic link from home to the directory. This is weird. As same thing worked like charm when I used it as a storage mount point.