Why does this not work? "ls *.txt | xargs cat > all.txt" (all files into single txt document)
Solution 1
ls *.txt | xargs cat >> all.txt
might work a bit better, since it would append to all.txt instead of creating it again after each file.
By the way, cat *.txt >all.txt
would also work. :-)
Solution 2
If some of your file names contain ', " or space xargs
will fail because of the separator problem
In general never run xargs
without -0 as it will come back and bite you some day.
Consider using GNU Parallel instead:
ls *.txt | parallel cat > tmp/all.txt
or if you prefer:
ls *.txt | parallel cat >> tmp/all.txt
Learn more about GNU Parallel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpaiGYxkSuQ
Solution 3
all.txt
is a file in the same directory, so cat gets confused when it wants to write from the same file to the same file.
On the other hand:
ls *.txt | xargs cat > tmp/all.txt
This will read from textfiles in your current directory into the all.txt in a subdirectory (not included with *.txt
).
ajo
Updated on September 17, 2022Comments
-
ajo almost 2 years
Why does this not work?
ls *.txt | xargs cat > all.txt
(I want to join the contents of all text files into a single 'all.txt' file.) find with -exec should also work, but I would really like to understand the xargs syntax.
Thanks
-
tripleee almost 5 yearsThough don't use
ls
for this. If you really can't usecat *.txt >all.txt
then tryprintf '%s\0' *.txt | xargs -r0 cat >all
and thenmv all all.txt
to avoid having the file referencing itself.
-
-
ajo almost 14 yearsThe cat *.txt >all.txt is naturally better. Thanks
-
ajo almost 14 yearsHowever, the ... | xargs cat >> all.txt or > all.txt always return error with xargs: unmatched single quote ... Is it because xargs takes everything after it as the command?
-
Janne Pikkarainen almost 14 yearsDo you have filenames with spaces? If so, then use something like "find /your/path -iname '*.txt' -print0 | xargs -0 cat >>all.txt" instead
-
ajo almost 14 yearsStill the following error: xargs: unmatched single quote; by default quotes are special to xargs unless you use the -0 option
-
ajo almost 14 yearsno, I replaced all the filename spaces with . But thinking of it, some filenames are likely to include single quotes as in listing_O'Connor.txt, this might be the problem!
-
Janne Pikkarainen almost 14 yearsYes, that's the problem then. :) The easiest and the sanest way is to use find with -print0 combined with xargs -0 -- then the whole chain will use NULL character as a separator and whitespace and special characters will be taken care of automatically.
-
ajo almost 14 yearsIndeed: After removing the single-quotes in some filenames via "s/'/_/g" *.txt, the command works OK!! But could it be done from within xargs via some option???
-
ajo almost 14 yearsOK, find isn't bad either... I remember having similar problems when the file names contained spaces!!
-
Janne Pikkarainen almost 14 yearsfind is much better than ls in case you need to recurse into subdirectories.
-
ajo almost 14 yearsfor the latter: what about ls -R? (apart from the directory line?!)
-
Janne Pikkarainen almost 14 yearsls -R maybe fine for human readable form, but if you need to handle something with xargs or other tools -- not so much. See, ls -R does not list the full path along with the every filename, but find or tree will do it. Makes scripting a lot easier. When scripting or piping stuff, please get rid of ls and use more advanced tools :-)
-
dwlz almost 10 yearsThis is potentially very dangerous command. If "all.txt" already exists, running this command will expand to fill all available hard drive space.