How to write rules for persistent net names?
Solution 1
To answer your specific question, add this to persistent-net.rules:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="AA:AA:AA:AA:AA:AA", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", NAME="eth0"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="BB:BB:BB:BB:BB:BB", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", NAME="eth0"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="CC:CC:CC:CC:CC:CC", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", NAME="eth1"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="DD:DD:DD:DD:DD:DD", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", NAME="eth1"
Leave persistent-net-generator.rules alone. udev will not overwrite the rules you added manually but the generator rules will cause new rules to be added for new cards as usual.
Solution 2
Usually all I want to do in terms of naming interfaces is to swap eth0 and eth1. I let the system create the file /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net-rules
, then edit it by switching the names, restart, then configure the interface stanzas in the network config files. Tedious but gets it done. There's a hint at the top of the file about this:
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
# line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.
# PCI device 0x8086:0x108c (e1000e) (custom name provided by external tool)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="00:25:90:22:74:24", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
Related videos on Youtube
![ndemou](https://i.stack.imgur.com/7ISNS.jpg?s=256&g=1)
ndemou
Updated on September 18, 2022Comments
-
ndemou almost 2 years
I know that a process generates persistent network card names based on rules found in /lib/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules. I also know how to completely disable this process with a simple
echo '#' > /etc/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules
but I've read that I "could also write my own rules file to give the interface a name — the persistent rules generator ignores the interface if a name has already been set" (/etc/udev/rules.d/README confirms that this is possible).
Can you provide instructions and/or examples on how to write such rules? (I mostly care about Debian/Ubuntu and a bit less for CentOS). In my case I would like to add rules like the following:
- cards with MAC A or B should be named eth0
- cards with MAC C or D should be named eth1
- follow default naming scheme for anything else
As a specific example of why I want to write custom rules: I have two identical servers with one onboard LAN and one PCI LAN. In case of HW failure I want to be able to move disks from HW#1 to HW#2 and it's important for eth0 to continue pointing to the onboard card and eth1 to the PCI card (no one wants to mess with cabling in the middle of a HW failure panic). My current workaround works but is a lot of work[1] so I wonder if writing custom rules would allow me to express the above rules
[1] install the OS in HW#1 and keep a copy of /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. Move the disks to HW#2 and keep a second copy of the same file. Concatenate the two copies and manually edit the NAME="ethX" part. Replace /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules with my version. Finally disable auto-creation of a new 70-persistent-net.rules using
echo '#' > /etc/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules
-
iSee about 10 yearsYou should try rephrasing your question, so that it's more specific. Say what you want to do (not what you want to learn about).
-
ndemou about 10 yearsThe truth is that to learn is what I want :). I've already found a workaround for my needs by disabling the persistent net name generator but I wonder if writing rules would be a better solution. However I can find no documentation. Thanks for your suggestion though
-
ndemou about 10 yearsWhy is it not? It does seem like a very good place to me (but I've been wrong a few times in the past :). I can surely rephrase my question to "game the system" but I don't want to trick a community that has served me well and I value a lot.
-
iSee about 10 yearsYour question is related to servers (and desktops), no doubt about it, but Server Fault isn't the place where anything goes. From What types of questions should I avoid asking?: "You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. Chatty, open-ended questions diminish the usefulness of our site and push other questions off the front page.". As a suggestion, Unix & Linux might be more appropriate for this kind of question, but please double check their rules before asking.
-
iSee about 10 yearsRegarding gaming the system, asking for a way to make the network interfaces be named in a specific manner, should be fine.
-
ndemou about 10 yearsI don't think my question was either chatty or open-ended (however I'm biased because I like me as a person a lot) but your suggestion about "asking for a way to make the network interfaces be named in a specific manner" seems good to me. Edited my question but after so many hours/days I'm loosing hope of getting an answer :(
-
ndemou almost 10 yearsMany thanks András. I obviously should add the above to /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, right? Should I also empty the /etc/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules file so that the system doesn't overwrite my custom 70-persistent-net.rules? If I should will the system follow default naming scheme for any other network card?
-
András Korn almost 10 yearsI updated my answer to address these questions as well.
-
ndemou about 9 yearsAndrás, it's best to remove the KERNEL="eth*" part of your rules otherwise they will not apply in cases where during boot the kernel gives a name that is not like eth* to an interface (in my case it was p9p1. I removed the KERNEL constrain and the rules got applied as expected).