Which version of ZFS allows shrinking of a pool?

14,353

Solution 1

No current release can shrink a pool and I have not heard any announcements of an upcoming feature to do so. Considering how rare it is that a properly designed pool would need the ability, I wouldn't expect it anytime soon.

Solution 2

The new ZFS version in Solaris 11.4 allows shrinkage of arrays. Say you have 5-disk array, you can now shrink to 4-disk array.

And, dedup has been fixed! It is using Greenbyte superior deduplication.

Solution 3

I cant find that it is supported, yet anyways.

Here's a printout from my Solaris 11 Express running ZFS pool version 31.

zpool upgrade -v
This system is currently running ZFS pool version 31.

The following versions are supported:

VER  DESCRIPTION
---  --------------------------------------------------------
 1   Initial ZFS version
 2   Ditto blocks (replicated metadata)    
 3   Hot spares and double parity RAID-Z    
 4   zpool history    
 5   Compression using the gzip algorithm         
 6   bootfs pool property    
 7   Separate intent log devices    
 8   Delegated administration    
 9   refquota and refreservation properties    
 10  Cache devices    
 11  Improved scrub performance    
 12  Snapshot properties    
 13  snapused property    
 14  passthrough-x aclinherit    
 15  user/group space accounting    
 16  stmf property support    
 17  Triple-parity RAID-Z    
 18  Snapshot user holds    
 19  Log device removal    
 20  Compression using zle (zero-length encoding)    
 21  Deduplication    
 22  Received properties    
 23  Slim ZIL    
 24  System attributes    
 25  Improved scrub stats    
 26  Improved snapshot deletion performance    
 27  Improved snapshot creation performance    
 28  Multiple vdev replacements    
 29  RAID-Z/mirror hybrid allocator   
 30  Encryption    
 31  Improved 'zfs list' performance

For more information on a particular version, including supported releases,
see the ZFS Administration Guide.

Solution 4

It looks that Alex Reece works on implementing the feature in the OpenZFS project: OpenZFS Device Removal blog.

Thorough ZFS in Solaris and OpenZFS are two different projects (see Wikipedia: ZFS).

Share:
14,353

Related videos on Youtube

700 Software
Author by

700 Software

Updated on September 17, 2022

Comments

  • 700 Software
    700 Software almost 2 years

    I found a list of versions and their Solaris release numbers http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19253-01/819-5461/appendixa-1/index.html

    I know that you can grow a pool by replacing drives with larger ones or adding new drives or mirrors to the pool. I heard that ZFS did not yet support shrinking pools by removing drives/mirrors. But that has probably been changed.

    Which version (if any) released the ability to shrink a pool?

    • Aleksandr Levchuk
      Aleksandr Levchuk about 13 years
      A really desired feature if you have disk fail with no ability to find a replacement. In that case some free space can be traded-in to restore the ZRAID redundancy.
    • 700 Software
      700 Software about 13 years
      @Aleksandr: Interesting concept :) You could use free space for redundancy even if there was no failure in disks. You would just have to make sure that the feature will trade in redundancy for extra space if you have too much usage, or if the usage goes up right after a disk failure. (better cap your usage or else it is possible to lose redundancy even without disk failure) (I am glad I am not the programmer making it work!)
    • Kalle Richter
      Kalle Richter over 6 years
      I suggested to add shrinking facilities for zfsonlinux at github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/6857.
  • Slizzered
    Slizzered about 9 years
    As @jan pointed out, there some feature in the works, that does at least allow some forms of vdev removal. Nothing released as of yet, but at least an announcement
  • 700 Software
    700 Software almost 8 years
    Link-only answers are not generally accepted on Stack Exchange. Perhaps explain the gist of how they are doing this, i.e. it looks like they are copying the contents to a smaller pool.
  • Kalle Richter
    Kalle Richter over 6 years
    The first link is dead.
  • Eugen Konkov
    Eugen Konkov over 6 years
    @GeorgeBailey: I have updated answer