Why does this HashMap.get return a null?
Solution 1
It is indeed exactly because of this issue.
You need to define what equality means on cards, so you need to override the equals
and hashCode
methods.
If you do not, it assumes that two cards are only equal if they're the same instance. (As in the default behavior of equals
.)
Note that, it is very important you override both equals
and hashCode
, as two objects that're equal must hash to the same value for a HashMap
to work correctly.
For more information, see Overriding equals and hashCode in Java.
Solution 2
Maybe it's a similar quick like how the var1 == var2 are not equals unless they point to the > same Object in memory, instead you have to use the var1.equals(var2)
Almost. As you would expect, a hash map needs a way of getting hash codes for your objects. In Java, this is provided by the hashCode method which is implemented by Object, but needs to be overridden by your Card class.
*update: as pst points out, it must also reimplement equals.
Solution 3
You need to implement the hashCode and equals methods, since this allows equality testing on two different objects, and also helps with hash map storage. Without implementing these, two objects will be seen as distinct even if their properties are the same. See http://www.jchq.net/certkey/0902certkey.htm for more details.
Solution 4
Card should override equals
and hashCode
.
Take a look here: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05273/index.html
Solution 5
You'll have to override the hashCode()
method for Card
and make it return the same value if and only if the cards are equal - you should override equals()
too. Because that's what the HashMap
relies on in order to find the objects referenced by the keys; as it stands now, it's the versions of those methods inherited from Object
that are being used, which will only match if you use the same objects as keys, whereas you're creating new, albeit 'equal', ones.
ProfessionalAmateur
Updated on June 22, 2022Comments
-
ProfessionalAmateur about 2 years
I'm trying to create a
Hashmap
to perform a lookup for me. However when I run this test code, the output is null. I think it has to due with the nature of how the keys are being stored, but Im not positive. Maybe it's a similar quirk like how thevar1 == var2
are not equals unless they point to the same Object in memory, instead you have to use thevar1.equals(var2)
?There are two classes to test this.
TestCard.java
import java.util.HashMap; public class TestCard { // HashMap for SpecialK Lookup private static HashMap<Card, Integer> specialKLookup = new HashMap<Card, Integer>(); // Constructor public TestCard(){ } public static void main(String[] args) { Card[] cards = new Card[3]; cards[0] = new Card((short)12, (short)0); cards[1] = new Card((short)0, (short)1); cards[2] = new Card((short)5, (short)2); /* Build SpecialK Lookup HashMap. * Ace of Spades = 0 * Ace of Hearts = 1 * Ace of Diamonds = 2 * Ace of Clubs = 3 * ... * Two of Clubs = 51 */ Integer specialKCounter = 0; for(int i=12;i>=0;i--){ for (int j=0;j<4;j++){ specialKLookup.put(new Card((short)i, (short)j), specialKCounter++); } } System.out.println(specialKLookup.get(cards[0])); } }
Card.java
public class Card{ private short rank, suit; private static String[] ranks = {"2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10", "Jack", "Queen", "King", "Ace"}; private static String[] suits = {"Spades", "Hearts", "Diamonds", "Clubs"}; //Constructor public Card(short rank, short suit){ this.rank = rank; this.suit = suit; } // Getter and Setters public short getSuit(){ return suit; } public short getRank(){ return rank; } protected void setSuit(short suit){ this.suit = suit; } protected void setRank(short rank){ this.rank = rank; } }
-
Admin about 13 yearsIt must also implement
equals
, per the contract. -
Arjan about 13 yearsIf
equals()
returns true, thehashCode()
must be the same. Ifequals()
returns false, the outcome ofhashCode()
still may be equal but also may differ. If the outcome ofhashCode()
differs,equals()
must return false. -
Steve Kuo about 13 yearsThis answer is incorrect in that two not equals objects can have the same hash code (ie, the statement that "if and only if the cards are equal " is incorrect). Arjan sums it up correctly.
-
entonio over 11 years@SteveKuo so if I removed 'and only if' from what I wrote, the answer would no longer be incorrect, but your comments would cease making sense. What should I do?