Why doesn't echo support "\e" (escape) when using the -e argument in MacOSX

27,620

Solution 1

I cannot tell you why it does not support that argument (you may have to ask the programmers about that). I only know that on my linux box, I get this:

$ /bin/echo --help
Usage: /bin/echo [SHORT-OPTION]... [STRING]...
  or:  /bin/echo LONG-OPTION
Echo the STRING(s) to standard output.

  -n             do not output the trailing newline
  -e             enable interpretation of backslash escapes
  -E             disable interpretation of backslash escapes (default)
      --help     display this help and exit
      --version  output version information and exit

If -e is in effect, the following sequences are recognized:
*emphasized text*
  \0NNN   the character whose ASCII code is NNN (octal)
  \\     backslash
  \a     alert (BEL)
  \b     backspace
  \c     produce no further output
  \f     form feed
  \n     new line
  \r     carriage return
  \t     horizontal tab
  \v     vertical tab

NOTE: your shell may have its own version of echo, which usually supersedes
the version described here.  Please refer to your shell's documentation
for details about the options it supports.

Report echo bugs to [email protected]
GNU coreutils home page: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/>
General help using GNU software: <http://www.gnu.org/gethelp/>
Report echo translation bugs to <http://translationproject.org/team/>
  • this does not mention \e escapes
  • it says that it is /bin/echo from gnu coreutils. As apple changes the source of their unix-system components from time to time (e.g. move from zsh to bash), check if there was a change for /bin/echo between Leopard and Snow Leopard. If it is gnu, you can ask the people at gnu.org why they choose not to include those sequences.

As for workarounds (thats more interesting): Not using /bin/echo, but bash's builtin echo works on linux boxes. If they changed to a bash without builtin echo (or something even more obscure), you could also try this not widely known feature of your shell (works at least in bash and zsh):

$ echo $'\e[34m''COLORS'

This is the matching part of bash's manpage:

   Words  of  the  form  $'string' are treated specially.  The word expands to string, with
   backslash-escaped characters replaced as specified by the ANSI  C  standard.   Backslash
   escape sequences, if present, are decoded as follows:
          \a     alert (bell)
          \b     backspace
          \e     an escape character
          \f     form feed
          \n     new line
          \r     carriage return
          \t     horizontal tab
          \v     vertical tab
          \\     backslash
          \'     single quote
          \nnn   the  eight-bit  character whose value is the octal value nnn (one to three
                 digits)
          \xHH   the eight-bit character whose value is the hexadecimal value  HH  (one  or
                 two hex digits)
          \cx    a control-x character

   The expanded result is single-quoted, as if the dollar sign had not been present.

   A  double-quoted string preceded by a dollar sign ($) will cause the string to be trans‐
   lated according to the current locale.  If the current locale is C or POSIX, the  dollar
   sign  is  ignored.  If the string is translated and replaced, the replacement is double-
   quoted.

Solution 2

Try \x1B instead of \e.

Solution 3

Does \033 still work? If not, you can hopefully press Ctrl+V followed by the Escape key (if a mac has those keys) to create a real control character inside the command line (which does not work that well in scripts of course, depending on the editor)

Solution 4

One other way of printing ANSI escape sequences in the shell is by using /usr/bin/printf.

Solution 5

To complement the existing helpful answers with some background information:

If you're invoking echo by name only - as opposed to with its path, /bin/echo - you're invoking the Bash builtin rather than the external utility.

The behavior of native Bash elements such as builtins is typically portable in a Bash sense, meaning they should work the same on any platform capable of running Bash.

\e is a curious exception that affects 3.x Bash versions on macOS (to this day, as of v10.13.5 (High Sierra), macOS comes with outdated 3.x versions of Bash, for legal reasons).

\e (and its alias \E) should work with echo -e; \e support was added to the echo builtin in Bash 2.0., but inexplicably doesn't in the 3.x stock version on macOS.

\e does work in 3.x Bash versions on other platforms, such as MSYS on Windows.

Conversely, if you install and use a 4.x Bash on macOS, \e does work.

Share:
27,620

Related videos on Youtube

hasseg
Author by

hasseg

I am a generalist software developer near Helsinki, Finland. I work at Futurice.

Updated on September 17, 2022

Comments

  • hasseg
    hasseg over 1 year

    When I try to print out some colored text using ANSI escape sequences via the built-in echo command, it seems that the \e escape sequence in the string I provide is interpreted literally instead of as the "escape" it's supposed to represent. This only happens in Snow Leopard -- the examples below work as intended in Leopard.

    Apparently echo does support the -e switch since it correctly interprets \n when using it:

    ~ $ 
    ~ $ echo "\n"
    \n
    ~ $ echo -e "\n"
    
    
    ~ $ 
    

    But when I try to use \e, I get this:

    ~ $ echo -e "\e[34mCOLORS"
    \e[34mCOLORS
    ~ $ 
    

    Like I said, in Leopard, the above would give me the string "COLORS" in color.

    Does anyone know of a reason why this might be an intended change? How about a workaround for printing ANSI escape sequences from Bash scripts on Snow Leopard?

    The Bash shell version on my Leopard machine is 3.2.17(1)-release and 3.2.48(1)-release on my Snow Leopard machine.

    • 0x89
      0x89 over 14 years
      The question contradicts the post. In the question you refer to /bin/echo, while in the post you use echo without path, which most probably is the builtin echo of your shell.
    • hasseg
      hasseg over 14 years
      Of course -- thanks for noticing. I fixed the question to reflect this.
  • hasseg
    hasseg over 14 years
    I wasn't aware of $'string' being escape sequence -enabled, thanks.
  • mouviciel
    mouviciel over 14 years
    printf is the portable way of displaying things in shell. There are too many flavours of echo...
  • Dennis Williamson
    Dennis Williamson over 14 years
    Here is the direct link to the material I think you intended: opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/echo.html
  • TachyonVortex
    TachyonVortex over 10 years
    Just for reference, 1B is the hex value of the Escape character.
  • TachyonVortex
    TachyonVortex over 10 years
    Just for reference, 33 is the octal value of the Escape character.
  • ocodo
    ocodo almost 8 years
    Just for future reader reference 033 would be standardised way to write octal.
  • SomeDude
    SomeDude over 6 years
    \e is not part of the POSIX standard; the GNU coreutils implementation extended on the standard. OS X did not.
  • Yongwei Wu
    Yongwei Wu almost 5 years
    Nope. The page continues to write: ‘If the first operand is -n, or if any of the operands contain a <backslash> character, the results are implementation-defined.’ Also, the macOS echo does interpret -e.
  • Otheus
    Otheus over 3 years
    Every day, MacOS befuddles me beyond measure.